My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Highway 371 North Improvement Project
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2004
>
10-05-2004 Special Council Meeting
>
Highway 371 North Improvement Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2016 12:41:33 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 12:41:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hwy 371 North <br /> September 27, 2004 <br /> Page 6 of 11 <br /> Thus,it appears,and the City requests,that upgrading this stretch should be included as part <br /> of these Trunk Highway improvements' costs. <br /> 17. The City has in the past looked at extending City sanitary sewer on the west side south from <br /> West Lake Street. The timing and financing of such an undertaking will most likely be from <br /> a developer-initiated project as opposed to a City-initiated project. <br /> Thus,unless a developer steps forward or the City puts together an overall finance plan,they <br /> most likely will not place utilities as part of this project. <br /> 18. The City has in the past looked at extending City watermain on the west side south from <br /> Pillsbury. The timing and financing of such an undertaking will most likely be from a <br /> developer-initiated project as opposed to a City-initiated project. <br /> Thus,unless a developer steps forward or the City puts together an overall finance plan,they <br /> most likely will not place utilities as part of this project. <br /> 19. The City has in the past looked at extending City watermain and sanitary sewer on the east <br /> side south from Engen Road. The timing and financing of such an undertaking will most <br /> likely be from a developer-initiated project as opposed to a City-initiated project. <br /> Thus,unless a developer steps forward or the City puts together an overall finance plan,they <br /> most likely will not place utilities as part of this project. <br /> 20. The City is aware that it has watermain in a casing pipe under TH 371 at Pillsbury and that <br /> the casing pipe will need to be extended at the City's cost as part of this project. <br /> This watermain (uncased) then turns north and parallels about 15 feet within the easterly <br /> TH 371 R/W for about 260 feet north before turning east along the south R/W of <br /> Morehouse Drive. <br /> This watermain was installed in 1999. Due to the unknown extent and timing of the <br /> proposed TH 371 improvements at that time, the City only paid for enough casing pipe to <br /> `cover' the existing highway. <br /> For the purposes of estimating a cost to the City, and not knowing the exact highway <br /> layout at this time, I will use 75 feet of additional casing pipe installed perpendicular to <br /> the highway and 260 feet of casing pipe installed parallel to the highway (excavation of <br /> existing watermain, installation of a `split' casing pipe, `welding' of the `split' casing <br /> pipe, and backfilling) at $150 per foot for a total of$50,250. <br /> 21. We understand MnDOT has warrants for the installation of stoplights as well as access <br /> management guidelines (for access and stoplights, the spacing varies from 0.25 miles to 1 <br /> CADocuments and SettingiAdministratot\Local SettingATemporary Internet File§OLKB\Comments for Council to consider sending to MnDOT <br /> 092704-memo.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.