Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br /> April 5, 2005 <br /> Page 3 <br /> -------------------------- <br /> �. Moreim spoke about the impact the number of docks would make to the lake. He <br /> indicated that he is opposed to allowing 40 mooring sights and requested the <br /> Council to allow the number allowed in the first tier. <br /> Ann Beaver, president of the Cullen Lakes Association showed drawings <br /> regarding the affect the number of allowed moorings would have on the area. <br /> John Erickson, legal counsel for the Cullen Lake Association indicated that the <br /> request does not follow the DNR rules and regulations. He indicated that the <br /> applicant has applied for residential densities. He noted that the proposal is not <br /> for a commercial development and is not a continuation of Wilderness Point <br /> Resort. Mr. Erickson indicated that a residential development does not support <br /> 40 mooring sites. Mr. Erickson recommended that the Council deny the CUP <br /> unless the applicant is limited to 22 mooring sites with no canopies or boat lifts. <br /> Tom Beaver indicated that Reeds Bay is a type 4-5 wetland and spoke about the <br /> effect docks and boats would have on the area. <br /> Georgia Maguire indicated that Middle Cullen is a high sediment lake and stated <br /> that wave action is a big threat to the lake. <br /> COUNCIL MEMBER SJOBLAD MOVED TO DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE <br /> PERMIT REQUEST. COUNCIL MEMBER PFEIFFER SECONDED THE <br /> MOTION. <br /> Paul Sandelin, City Attorney, indicated that the Planning Commission's decision <br /> reflected that the developer could construct 41 units in the first tier based upon a <br /> footprint of 1800 square feet and stated that this is consistent with and is <br /> supported by the City's Zoning Ordinance. <br /> Council Member Sjoblad indicated his concerns with the number of mooring sites <br /> in relation to water quality, aesthetics and vulnerability of the lake. <br /> Council Member Nagel indicated he shared Council Member Sjoblad's concerns. <br /> He also indicated that he would like to see the canopies eliminated. <br /> Council Member Sjoblad indicated that the property owners will not be required <br /> to rent the property. He indicated that the Council now has an opportunity to <br /> protect the lake. <br /> Council Member Bolz-Andolshek indicated that the proposal seems logical. He <br /> indicated that he would be open to being sensitive to the wetlands and possibly <br /> moving the location of the moorings. He also indicated that limiting the number of <br /> mooring sites would not necessarily keep boats out of the water. <br />