My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07 - Planning and Zoning Monthly Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2006
>
12-04-2006 Council Meeting
>
07 - Planning and Zoning Monthly Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2016 3:41:57 PM
Creation date
7/11/2016 3:41:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9. The Rural Residential Zone is compatible with Forest Management, Recreation, <br /> Agriculture, and Transition Residential zones, although cannot be surrounded by <br /> Forestry and Agriculture. <br /> 10. The property was zoned Rural Residential under the previous ordinance and had a <br /> minimum lot size of 5 acres, and the new Rural Residential lot minimum size is <br /> the same. Therefore the proposed rezoning would be an equal lot size minimum <br /> requirement from the previous zoning classification and will not result in a <br /> downzoning. <br /> 11. The property meets the minimum lot size for the Rural Residential zone, being <br /> roughly 10 acres in size. The property meets the mini lot width for both <br /> street frontages in the Rural Residential zone, being o-" ( feet wide on both <br /> sides. <br /> 12. Representation of the applicant has failed to 1 ndings to support his <br /> client's request to zone it commercial. <br /> Mary Pfeiffer stated that the applicant is very sick= ' Mayo Clinic wait r a <br /> transplant. ji <br /> a <br /> The Planning Commission stated that Ms. Watt has attorney as representation. <br /> He has not given any finding why it ould be comme <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion c <br /> ad <br /> APPLICANT: City o .,!f akes 3, <br /> Applicant requests Ordin� ce Amend t to Increase Accessory Structure Size <br /> in the Shoreline tial Z�'e. ;,, <br /> Ms. Baraj as d the Re <br /> \�W-4 <br /> A mo , was made b Hab , e, onded by Mark Hallan,to recommend the City <br /> Cout�c = end Section s di on 4,J as stated defined in the Staff Report. All <br /> s <br /> member "aye". Mop ,n c ed. <br /> APPLICANT: quot Lakes <br /> Applicant requests Ordinance Amendment Establishing an Extractive Use <br /> Overlay District. A <br /> Mr. Adams and Ms. Barajas explained the discussion from last month and the Staff <br /> Report. The Planning Commission suggested using the road to cut off the overlay along <br /> the north side of Section 12. The area would then be defined on the south by Akerson <br /> Road,the east by Nelson Road and the north by Wild Acres Road. <br /> Staff was directed to look at criteria for a CUP and bring to the December meeting. <br /> Section 8.5 needs to be tightened up. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 4 <br /> November 16, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.