My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07 - Planning and Zoning Monthly Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2006
>
12-04-2006 Council Meeting
>
07 - Planning and Zoning Monthly Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2016 3:41:57 PM
Creation date
7/11/2016 3:41:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Adams explained that the City had received a request from Ms. Watt's attorney to <br /> table this public hearing to the December Planning Commission meeting. <br /> A motion was made by Scott Pederson, seconded by John Derksen,to table this public <br /> hearing to December. After discussion, Mr. Derksen withdrew his second and Mr. <br /> Pederson withdrew his motion. <br /> The Planning Commission discussed the Findings of Fact and decided to add the <br /> following one: Representation of the applicant has failed to develop findings to support <br /> his client's request to zone it commercial. <br /> do <br /> 1 <br /> A motion was made by John Derksen, seconded by Mark H to recommend the City <br /> Council rezone this parcel Rural Residential,based on the Findings of Fact: <br /> 1. The rezoning to Rural Residential is cons' th the �� Comprehensive <br /> Plan and Future Land Use Map, wh designates this pr as a Rural <br /> Residential. <br /> 2. The present land use tax classification of t ce or seasonal r , �dential. <br /> 3. The landowner's stated desire to zone cel �fo Commereial would be <br /> inconsistent with the City's:�Comprehensive and Future Land Use Map, <br /> which designates this area as� al Res, y' a. The partial commercial <br /> zoning would also be considers of zoning, -ng this property owner <br /> special privileges unafforded to hose oring l operties within the City <br /> `.. \ . <br /> boundaries. \\ \\����` <br /> 4. Rezoning to C " "A X would be �onsisten th the immediate surrounding <br /> land use pa ' y Thi" - ,particularl he case, given the Future Land Use Map <br /> designatio a pres zoning of e' ng adjacent properties. <br /> 5. The subject pro i e to pr� 'erties that have been rezoned to Rural <br /> Resi o the th ,, °€r,1 i "cross County Highway 112, and Forest <br /> dge cen e west. <br /> 6.0 e propert y edi jacent to the south reflects an established <br /> lopment pa of rur esidential housing. The larger property to the north <br /> is " 'de of the lirrlrts, but also reflects a present land use pattern for <br /> resid uses. <br /> 7. The pri „ fron a of this property is along County Highway 16 and all future <br /> land use ons of parcels along this northern boundary thoroughfare of <br /> City of Peq\\t Lakes are guided as Future Land Uses for Rural Residential, <br /> Agriculture,'or Forestry Management. This reflects a major land use pattern of <br /> both current and future use for this area of the City. Any change from pattern <br /> would constitute a major departure from the City's current policy for land use in <br /> this area and would require an extensive re-examination of its Comprehensive <br /> Plan and a subsequent amendment thereto. Without such an initiative, this would <br /> in fact be considered spot zoning. <br /> 8. The Rural Residential zone is compatible with the Agriculture, Forest <br /> Management, Transitional Residential, and Recreation Zones. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 3 <br /> November 16, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.