My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Handouts from the January 11, 2006 Council Meeting
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2006
>
01-11-2006 Special Council Meeting
>
Handouts from the January 11, 2006 Council Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2016 10:05:50 AM
Creation date
7/7/2016 3:14:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Ron Wickham Page 2 January 11, 2006 <br /> Anderson Brothers Construction <br /> Atlas HA-380 depicts the watershed to be made of Quaternary glacial drift <br /> overlying Precambrian bedrock. The glacial drift deposits can consist of mixtures <br /> of clay, silt, sand, and gravel. The USGS identifies the Property as sand and <br /> gravel surficial outwash, with a saturated thickness between 100 and 200 feet. It <br /> states that the water table is shallow and unconfined, and that the aquifer's high <br /> porosity and permeability often permit yields of several hundred gallons per <br /> minute (gpm) to large diameter wells. The USGS estimates the transmissivity j <br /> (i.e., the saturated thickness multiplied by the hydraulic conductivity) of the area <br /> to be between 10,000 and 100,000 gallons per day per foot of aquifer. <br /> Atlas HA-380 shows shallow groundwater between 1200 and 1250 feet National <br /> Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) for the Property. it also shows groundwater <br /> flow to be from the northwest to the southeast from Mayo Lake toward East and <br /> West Twin Lakes; this estimate of flow corresponds with the direction implied by <br /> the normal water levels for these lakes given on the Nisswa, Minnesota USGS <br /> topographic map. <br /> We have reviewed some of the logs for wells shown on the attached Nearby <br /> Water Wells Mapped by the MN Geological Survey diagram. The geologic <br /> descriptions on these logs generally agree with those in Atlas HA-380. However, <br /> the wells shown on the attached diagram are only subset of the wells listed in <br /> CWI for the six Public Land Survey sections nearest to the site; we have <br /> attached the full CWI list for these sections. We also reviewed the gradation <br /> results of eight soil samples that you supplied to us that were collected from <br /> exploratory borings on the Property. <br /> Conclusions <br /> The possibility of a petroleum release does exist in any construction or mining <br /> operation that involves machinery. However, if an appropriate Spill Prevention, <br /> Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) plan is followed, the risk to the <br /> environment can be greatly reduced, possibly to the point of being eliminated. <br /> Common SPCC elements include secondary containment for storage of <br /> hazardous materials or petroleum (e.g., double-walled aboveground storage <br /> tanks [ASTs] or secondary containment structures for ASTs and fuel transfer <br /> areas) and response plans for immediate recovery of releases. Minnesota <br /> Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) protocols and guidance for reporting and <br /> responding to any spill must be followed at a minimum. <br /> Based on the above information, it appears that groundwater is flowing away <br /> from Mayo Lake toward East and West Twin Lakes. If a petroleum release is not <br /> contained or recovered and is large enough to leach to the groundwater table, its <br /> plume will likely flow in the same direction as the groundwater, away from Mayo <br /> Lake. Based on the geologic descriptions and soil gradation results, we estimate <br /> that the hydraulic conductivity of the underlying aquifer is about 10-2 centimeters <br /> per second or 28 feet per day, with a porosity of about 25 percent. If governed <br /> by the surface water elevation differences between Mayo Lake and East and <br /> West Twin Lakes, the groundwater flow velocity would range between 0.1 and <br /> GNIE CONSULTANTS,INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.