Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 19. There has been no sanitary sewer or water supply design information provided. <br /> i. Publicly owned water and sewage treatment systems are not available at <br /> this site. Water supply and wastewater treatment must be handled <br /> privately as part of this development. <br /> ii. The site plan submitted indicates that sewage treatment will be <br /> centralized. There is no information on the location of water supply <br /> systems. There is no information on any approvals being provided by <br /> state review agencies. <br /> iii. The applicant has submitted soils information demonstrating the <br /> suitability of the soils to treat wastewater in both a primary and a <br /> secondary location. <br /> 20.There has been no erosion control plan submitted. <br /> 21. The applicant has not indicated an exterior lighting plan indicating type of lighting to <br /> be used and lighting patterns. <br /> 22.The property contains no shoreline and the development will not provide access to <br /> any shore recreation facilities. <br /> 23.Building standards specified in the Ordinance do not apply as the proposed dwelling <br /> units will be recreational vehicles, not constructed dwellings. The resort will be <br /> operated seasonally and,therefore,winterizing of the water systems is not necessary. <br /> 24.Parking and driving areas are proposed to be paved. <br /> 4 On the Suitability for a Planned Unit Development <br /> 25.There is no recreational use of surface waters provided with this development. There <br /> will likely be an increase in the use of the area's lakes as a result of this development <br /> as the development will provide more opportunities for people to live in and visit the <br /> area. The overall increase in surface water usage associated with this development is <br /> not measurable with any currently known data and is not believed to be significant. <br /> 26.The aesthetic impacts of increased density are unknown, but it is believed that they <br /> can be mitigated through screening and buffering. <br /> 27.The land contains areas that are relatively flat with good building sites and other <br /> areas that have difficult terrain, making this site suitable for the Planned Unit <br /> Development approach. There are no wetlands on the site. <br /> 28.The adjacent properties are privately-owned, undeveloped large tracts, with the <br /> exception of. <br /> i. a parcel to the north of lots 84 through 93,which is owned by Jeff Oelke and <br /> has one single-family dwelling,and <br /> ii. a parcel that is completely surrounded by the development, which is owned <br /> by Jerry Grossoehme and has one single-family dwelling. <br /> The highway access and limited development options of surrounding parcels makes <br /> this parcel suitable for the proposed approach. <br /> 29.The parcel is over 54 acres and is non-riparian. It is identified in the Recreational <br /> Vehicle Resort Overlay District as being suitable for the style of proposed <br /> development. <br /> 4 On the CUP Evaluation <br /> 30.The proposed development is an appropriate use in the AG zone within the <br /> Recreational Vehicle Resort Overlay District. <br /> 31. The proposed development does not conflict with the City of Pequot Lakes Land Use <br /> Plan. <br /> 32.The proposed use of an RV resort, with appropriate conditions, is compatible with <br /> the existing neighborhood. Many of the surrounding properties are undeveloped and <br /> are zoned for forest management and long-term low, density development. The <br /> overlay district indicates the compatibility of this style of development with the <br /> adjacent land uses. <br /> 33•The proposed use, with conditions, will not be injurious to the public health, safety, <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 5-7 <br /> March 16,2Oo6 <br />