Conditional Use Permit for the RV Resort Village at the Preserve, Helbling

Home Browse Search

4. Adjacent to each site is a strip of land for a service road. The strips of land range from 40 feet to 5o feet wide,thus meeting the minimum standard 5. Parking is provided on each individual site. 6. Recreational facilities are provided and are addressed during the PUD portion of the review. 7. There do not appear to be any obstacles to providing adequate water supply to the property,but detailed plans have not been submitted. 8. A primary and secondary sewage treatment site has been identified There has been no information provided as to the adequacy of this site to handle the projected flows. 9. Solid waste facilities have not been identified. lo. Preliminary sketches have indicated that there are fire pits with each site, but this has not been indicated on any of the CUP submittals. il. Connections to the centralized wastewater treatment system have not been identified. 12. Most of the sites appear to be well-drained, although a grading plan has not been submitted or evaluated Some sites may have drainage problems,specifically: i. Sites 16 through 18 on Block 1 are in a depressed area that collects stormwater and would not be well-drained. ii. Sites 29 and 3o have a depressed area that collects stormwater and do not appear to be well-drained. iii. Sites within Block 2 take on significant volumes of stormwater from adjacent sites and open spaces. 13. Three storm shelters are proposed for the site. It is not clear if these facilities are adequate to protect the health safety and welfare of the campground guests and residents. + On the Design Criteria for a Planned Unit Development 14. The proposed development contains 156 units,exceeding the minimum requirement of three units for a PUD. 15. All facilities and sites are set back a minimum of fifty feet from the lot lines. It is not clear the degree of screening that this will provide, although the following concerns exist: i. The buffer area directly north of sites 84 through 93 currently have no significant vegetation to provide screening. ii. The buffer area west and north of the proposed fenced storage area extending east to the property line has some vegetation, but the significant screening is being provided by vegetation on adjacent properties. iii. The buffer area east of sites 1 through 12 are wooded and provide adequate screening. Significant grading is going to need to be done in this area to provide sites that are usable. It is not clear what the impact of this grading on the overall screening will be. iv. The buffer area south of sites 16 through 18 are wooded. Significant grading is going to need to be done in this area to provide sites that are usable. It is not clear what the impact of this grading on the overall screening of these sites will be. V. A fifty-foot buffer is provide along the existing westerly property line, although the westerly 33-feet of the property is to be dedicated to the City as part of a future subdivision. It is not clear what impact this will have on the ability to provide adequate screening. vi. No additional screening is identified within this proposal. 16. There is no calculation of open space available. 17. There is no calculation of common space available. 18.There has been no stormwater management plan designed and submitted. City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 5-6 March 16,2Oo6