My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - Minutes 051707
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
06-05-2007 Planning Commission Special Meeting
>
3 - Minutes 051707
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2016 9:02:10 AM
Creation date
6/15/2016 9:02:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Marohn stated that MnDOT does not guarantee a level of traffic for business. Mr. <br /> Hukriede agreed. <br /> Mr. Hukriede stated where do you start and stop if you started to compensate for change <br /> in traffic volumes. <br /> Mr. Sjoblad asked how the R/W acquisition process work? Mr. Hukriede stated: <br /> 1. Show property owner impacts and start to understand property. <br /> 2. MnDOT appraises. <br /> 3. MnDOT makes an offer. <br /> 4. Landowner can make their own appraisal at MnDOT's <br /> 5. Agreement or Eminent Domain. <br /> Mr. Sjoblad asked if MnDOT does this if the City pays cons n costs? Mr. Bray <br /> �# stated that MnDOT tries to do all acquisition,whe to r city,` thold up project. <br /> City may need to pay. <br /> r <br /> Mr.Ryan asked in the EAW,it stated goal was t ect nhance local siness. <br /> How do you reconcile R/W acquisition/compensati this goal? Mr. ukriede <br /> stated MnDOT's R/W group looks a ost impacts. will look back at purpose <br /> and need statement. Mr. Ryan doesn process sin this. <br /> Mr. Marohn stated he had worked with on 169 a more global <br /> perspective of economic im acts. It is at an etween individual <br /> businesses and a more proach. <br /> Mr. Habein aske a wi used access compensated? Mr. Hukriede stated <br /> yes. <br /> Mr.Na e alte route,o d highway will be turned back to the County. <br /> In eff businesses eir ac State Highway. Mr. Bray and Mr. Hukriede <br /> stat ose property ill ha cress to a public road, so there would be no <br /> damange. <br /> Mr. Marohn sta a is a siness with access to the highway. It is closed and replaced <br /> with a backage roa compensation? Mr. Hukriede stated possibly, if a loss or <br /> change in property v e. <br /> Mr. Marohn asked if a change in property value is the trigger? Mr. Hukriede stated no. <br /> Closing first,then look at property value. <br /> Mr. Woog asked-if NInDOT goes with the alternate route,the old highway turns back to <br /> the County,would all accesses remain as they are today? Mr. Hukriede stated the State <br /> needs to turn back a safe roadway. No accesses would be closed unless there was a <br /> safety issue. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.