Laserfiche WebLink
3. Rezoning parcels 290271201BB0009 and 290271402C00009 to Rural Residential <br /> would be consistent with their previous zoning classification of Rural Residential <br /> with the same minimum lot size and lot width requirements. <br /> 4. The Rural Residential zone is compatible with the Agriculture, Forest <br /> Management, Transitional Residential, and Recreation Zones. <br /> 5. Rezoning parcel 290271100E00009 to Forest Management would be consistent <br /> with the property's previous zoning designation of Forestry, which contained the <br /> same lot size and dimension requirements. <br /> 6. Rezoning parcel 290271100E00009 to Forest Management would be compatible <br /> with the surrounding zoning classification, which is oposed to be Forest <br /> Management. \\\� \`\ <br /> ENNO <br /> 7. Rezoning parcel 290271100E00009 to Forest Mana ent would not be entirely <br /> consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plary ,��,states that the Forest <br /> very large � <br /> Preservation areas would be e lot i denti 0-80 acres) within� , <br /> forested land. This parcel is only 5 acres i2 d may tter suited in the <br /> Rural Residential zoning classification. <br /> 8. Parcel 290271100E00009 does not in e minift um lot size o s for the <br /> Forest Management zone, being roughly res in Vie. The prop„� , however, <br /> was anon-conforming property due to e under the previous zoning <br /> classification of Forestry. ezoning to Fo Management would not be <br /> inconsistent with previously e� requirements <br /> 9. Parcel 29027110E00009 is clos '�� the mim f6t size of 5 aces for the <br /> Rural Residential zone, being a roxi 4.9 acr, in size. The parcel also <br /> meets the minimum lot width of 2 _ feei\ 400 feet wide. <br /> 10. Parcel 29027120 1 �� 9 does not feet the in \mum lot size of 5 acres for the <br /> Rural Resid al distri it is rou ly half an acre in size. This lot would be <br /> consideredconfo g under the w"Ordinance, but it was also considered <br /> non-conforming to under the ld Ordinance. <br /> ,ii w�t <br /> 11. Parcel 271402 09 cab et the minimum lot size of 5 acres for the <br /> 1 esicl1 zone;,:;. ing about 4.6 acres in size. The property does meet the <br /> inimum lot of 2 �ee eing over 300 feet wide. <br /> All mein mooted"aye". otiod6arried. <br /> APPLICANT. Cof Pequot Lakes <br /> Applicant requests 'rezone from Forestry to Rural Residential. Jerry and Rose <br /> Grossoehme, property owners. Parcel No.: 2902714021100009. <br /> Jerry Grossoehme was present. Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Dan Helbling <br /> was also present. He is in the process of purchasing the property from Mr. Grossoehme. <br /> Mr. Grossoehme stated that they haven't completed the arrangement but he expects that <br /> they will. He asked if this could be tabled to next month. He also stated he was in favor <br /> of moving forward with the rezone and if the sale does not go through, Staff could <br /> withdraw this matter from the January Council Report. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 7 <br /> December 14, 2006 <br />