8A - Minutes 121406 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. Rezoning the northern smaller parcel (290271100000009) would be inconsistent �. with the existing land use, as this property currently contains two commercial businesses. 4. Rezoning the larger parcel to Forest Management would meet the compatibility requirements for the zoning as this property does contain significant forest coverage, particularly in the northern portion of the property. 5. Rezoning to Commercial along State Highway 371 would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use map which does not designate this area for commercial use. 6. The properties were zoned Commercial along the State Hi \\ way 371 frontage to a point just to the south of Parcel 290271100D00009 tending to the west roughly 300 feet under the previous ordinance. R 7. The two smaller parcels (C & D) meet the minimilo e of 20,000 square feet l minim,",the Commercial zone, each being approximal 1.4 a in size. Each parcel also meets the minimum lot width of 50 feet, , ' v g roug 00 feet of width.rvl 1 1 8. The larger parcel (AAA) meets the mmi" um lot size of 10 acr d lot width of 300 feet for the Forest Managemen , being'�aver 26 acres 1 °W and over 800 feet wide on either side of the roe �� P P rtY 9. The City has taken care in ensuring thatw ies are not downzoned from previous classifications. Not;; ezoning these rues to Commercial in some extent would constitute a do /j/, All members voted"aye". Motion carrie 1 `\\ :,... L .OP APPLICANT 2,� f Pequ akes Applicant requv rezone m Forestry �Rural Residential to Forest Management and Rui liit;Resi L. Terri rris,property owner,Parcel No.: 290271100PO Chard, We rty owner, Parcel No.: WO \ G/, 29027120 0 Trey ��VIegan Oelke, property owners, Parcel No.: 29027`„ ,\2C00009. \\ Charles\P on was in a danc Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Mr. Peterson sta accepts recommendation in the Staff Report. Mr. Peterson's home is on this parce. e pare is approximately 35,000 sq. ft. The Planning Commission stated that Parcel i d nearly be surrounded by Forest Management. A motion was mad Tom Adams, seconded by John Derksen,to recommend rezoning these parcels to Rural Residential, based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. The rezoning to Rural Residential and Forest Management is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map, which designates these properties as Forest Preservation to the north and Rural Residential to the south. 2. Rezoning to Rural Residential and Forest Management would be compatible with the immediate surrounding zoning classifications, which are Shoreline Residential to the west and Agriculture and proposed to be Forest Management to the east. Planning Commission Minutes 6 December 14, 2006