Laserfiche WebLink
8. Rezoning these properties entirely to Shoreline Residential would not constitute a <br /> down-zoning as these properties were previously zoned Residential with similar <br /> provisions governing their use. <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> APPLICANT: City of Pequot Lakes <br /> Applicant requests to rezone from Commercial and Forestry to Forest Management <br /> and Rural Residential. Charles Peterson,property owner, Pa , el No.: <br /> 290271100AAA009. Gary Peterson, property owner, Parce <br /> 290271100000009. Thomas Peterson, property owner,P S I No.: <br /> 290271100D00009. <br /> Charles Peterson was in attendance. Mr. Marohn eLe Ahe Sta �,;,� ort. Mr. <br /> Peterson stated that when the County rezoned hiopert the south li �� the <br /> Commercial extended all the way to the south one. Th , ortion of Co � dal along <br /> County Road 168 was 300 feet deep, this map in es it Abe 200 feet "has a <br /> storage building on this parcel and the 200 feet ofcial does not inc u the <br /> building. He would like it to be 300 feet to include the \\age building. <br /> Mr. Marohn explained that it is inconsi the Compr e Plan to extend <br /> commercial further south. He also stated' at e building can continue in Forest <br /> Management. It is a legal non-conformin ; se ei st Management or <br /> Commercial. The Future`\`"� se Map in'rl ates these, arcels at Rural Residential and <br /> Forest Preservation <br /> \ <br /> Mayor Malecha explal a that too place with Sibley Township. <br /> The PI �o n di, ed the remainder of the proposed Commercial zone <br /> locat blow Parcel whic�h�� �oximately 100 feet X 350 feet. The minimum lot <br /> sizeOn ercial zo 20,00quare feet. <br /> A motion w by De/�Williams, seconded by Scott Pederson, to approve rezoning <br /> these parcels as , mme , d in the Staff Report, based on the following Findings of <br /> „ ,�, <br /> Fact: i�IF <br /> 1. The rezoning'to Rural Residential and Forest Management is consistent with the <br /> City's Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map, which designates the <br /> smaller parcels as Rural Residential and the larger tract as Forest Preservation. <br /> 2. Should the larger property be rezoned to Forest Management, rezoning the two <br /> smaller properties to Rural Residential would be inconsistent with the <br /> compatibility requirements for that zoning district, which states that the Rural <br /> Residential zone may not be completely surrounded by the Forest Management <br /> and Agriculture zones. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 5 <br /> December 14, 2006 <br />