Laserfiche WebLink
ROLL CALL VOTE: Mr. Habein and Mr. Williams recused themselves as they are <br /> members of Gloria Dei Lutheran Church: All remaining members voted"aye". Motion <br /> carried. <br /> (We moved to the New Business portion of the Agenda) <br /> NEW BUSINESS: <br /> a. Metes and Bounds Subdivision, Gloria Dei Lutheran Church, applicant. <br /> Ms. Barajas explained the Staff Report and recommended Finding of Fact#13 be <br /> amended as Tract A does have frontage on public right-of-way per the City Attorney's <br /> determination. <br /> There was no public comment: <br /> A motion was made by John Derksen, seconded by Ro aril e pprove the metes <br /> and bounds subdivision based on the following Fin ' act: <br /> 1. The property is properly zoned Co and i uitable in its state for <br /> commercial and residential uses as pe in zone, as th roperty has <br /> been used for residential and religious purpo <br /> 2. There are not any significan tural features, as steep slopes or wetlands, <br /> that would constrain future de ent on these rties. <br /> 3. The two structures located o erty are c . g as they meet all <br /> required setbacks and the total ' rvio under a 25%maximum allowed. <br /> 4. Each of the lots in the propose s ivi a separate on-site sewage <br /> treatment syste <br /> 5. Tract A is s d by services, He Tract B has an on-site well for a water <br /> supply so <br /> 6. The applicant is r any pro ions for water-based recreation as these <br /> pro I not a nt bodies. <br /> 7. o s e um boil able lot size of 20,000 square feet in the C <br /> ne,with Tra eing square feet and Tract B being nearly 7 acres. <br /> ots meet the 'mum width of 50 feet, with Tract A being over 200 feet <br /> wi d Tract B g ov r 500 feet wide. <br /> 9. All s meet pervious coverage limit of 25% for the Commercial zone, <br /> with Tr had approximately 22% coverage with the proposed driveway <br /> included currently having about 17%coverage. <br /> 10. The propose of layouts are compatible with the existing layout of adjoining <br /> properties and the proposed lot lines are parallel and perpendicular to existing lot <br /> lines. Future development will not be constrained by the proposed lot layouts. <br /> 11. The proposed side lot line is at right angles to the existing road line and the <br /> property line of the adjacent property. <br /> 12. Tract B meets the minimum frontage on public right-of-way requirement of 33 <br /> feet,having more than 500 feet. <br /> 13. Tract A does have frontage on a public right-of-way, on Olson Street to the north. <br /> Mr. Hallan directed Staff to remove the word "sanitary" from Finding of Fact#5. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 4 <br /> March 15, 2007 <br />