Laserfiche WebLink
L.. A motion was made by John Derksen, seconded by Mark Hallan,to approve the <br /> Conditional Use Permit based on the following Findings of Fact: <br /> 1. The proposed use is an appropriate conditional use in the Commercial District. <br /> The Land Use Matrix indicates single family dwellings are considered conditional <br /> uses in the Commercial zone. <br /> 2. The proposed does not conflict with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which <br /> does not address housing in commercial districts, but does indicate that the City <br /> should encourage and promote home ownership within the City. <br /> 3. The proposed use, with conditions, would be comp a ' le with the existing <br /> neighborhood. An apartment complex is located to the th light industrial <br /> operations to the south. <br /> 4. The proposed use would not be injurious to the p c h, safety, or welfare as <br /> it is located in the existing parsonage buildin , ch h en used in a similar <br /> manner for a number of years. <br /> 5. The proposed use is unlikely to be inj s to the use and ent of other <br /> properties in the immediate vicinity, a sings family dwell a larger <br /> apartment complex and light industria 0 n. <br /> 6. The proposed use should not impede the and orderly development and <br /> improvement of surrounding acant properties, cially as the proposed use is, <br /> in itself, a reuse of an existing ' g. There are dditional public services or <br /> facilities required for the develo 's prope <br /> 7. The applicant proposes to access s p om on Street, to the north on <br /> the City-maintained ortion of the tre an not create traffic congestion <br /> or interference c on the s ding s ts. <br /> 8. The site of a pro use con 'ns existing parking facilities, off-street, <br /> sufficient the re ed two stal er Section 7.10 of the Ordinance. <br /> 9. The proposed u g roduc oise, dust, or odors at a level that would <br /> cons uisan <br /> 10. rop a is 'ned within an existing structure and will not result in <br /> e destructio mov scenic or historic sites of major significance. <br /> roposed us: co nta d within an existing structure and will not require <br /> a al storm w m agement improvements. <br /> 12. The cant has dicated that no changes will be made to the exterior <br /> landsca e p on of the property surrounding the dwelling is currently <br /> wooded. <br /> subject to the follo condition: <br /> 1. The current driveway that runs between the church and the parsonage will be <br /> removed or fenced. <br /> The President of the Board of Trustees was in the audience and stated that the church has <br /> no objection to removing a portion of the driveway. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 3 <br /> March 15, 2007 <br />