My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
10-19-2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2016 1:51:38 PM
Creation date
6/7/2016 1:51:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#290224100000009, Francis Razidlo, property owner; Parcel#290224100DA0889, <br /> Lloyd Wass, property owner; Parcel#290224100DB0009, Minnesota DNR, property <br /> owner; Parcel#290224100FA0889, Gregory Seils, property owner; Parcel <br /> #2902243041300009,Edward Larsen, property owner. <br /> Ms. Barajas explained the Staff Report. These parcels were not part of the city-wide <br /> rezoning. Charlene Seils stated that their residence is approximately 1,000 feet from the <br /> OHW and that the proposed 500-foot Shoreline Residential area was not deep enough. <br /> Lloyd Wass stated that his residence is approximately 600 feet from the OHW. Ms. <br /> Barajas stated that if the backage roads are constructed with the Highway 371 project,the <br /> dividing line could be reevaluated at that time. Keith Anderson stated that he owns <br /> property on the south side of Blueberry Lane and that 500 feet is okay, but 1,500 feet of <br /> Commercial might be too much. The landowners were reminded that what their property <br /> is zoned has nothing to do with real estate taxes. <br /> Due to the depth of these lots,the Planning Commission would like to know where the <br /> residences are located on the lots. <br /> A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded by Bill Habein,to have staff determine <br /> where the residences are and to recommend the distance from the Highway that should be <br /> commercial. All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> ADDITION OR DELETIONS TO AGENDA: <br /> ADD: <br /> 6. b. December Meeting Date. <br /> 7. e. Downtown Plan. <br /> NEW BUSINESS: <br /> Sign Ordinance Discussion: <br /> Ms. Barajas explained the Staff Report. She stated that the Planning Commission would <br /> need to answer the questions at the end of the report. It was the consensus to make it a <br /> larger sign for a residential development a Conditional Use Permit. That would allow the <br /> Planning Commission to review the size and landscaping. Thirty-two square feet and 8- <br /> feet high as measured from the ground was not excessive. Lighting should be downward, <br /> not spotlights. Setback from lot lines was discussed— 1-foot required in Ordinance but <br /> sight-lines should not be obstructed. Total signage cannot exceed 32 square feet and can <br /> be split up if more than one entrance. <br /> December Meeting Date: <br /> Due to the regular meeting date falling so close to the Christmas Holiday, the December <br /> meeting will be held on December 14, 2006. Mr. Hallan has a conflict on that date and <br /> may not be able to attend. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 4 <br /> October 19, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.