My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
10-21-2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2016 11:28:22 AM
Creation date
6/7/2016 11:28:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
make health, safety and welfare conditions. It is reasonable to let him put in footings <br /> below grade; that could be the gray area. <br /> A motion was made by John Derksen, seconded by Mark Hallan, to allow option 2 to <br /> construct a new basement 2 feet higher and to bring the impervious coverage to 25%with <br /> a stormwater management plan. <br /> Mr. Marohn explained he included information on the Grasspave system because it may <br /> be difficult for the applicant to reach the impervious coverage limit. <br /> Mr. Lind pointed out that Pine Grove Street has been paved to reduce runoff to the lake. <br /> The portion of driveway that is removed could increase erosion. The Planning <br /> Commission pointed out that vegetation is not enough; the water needs to be slowed <br /> down. There currently is maintained vegetation right to the lake. <br /> The Planning Commission clarified that the basement increase in height is 2 feet, not 2 <br /> courses of block. <br /> Mr. Marohn explained that he is willing to meet on the property with the surveyor and <br /> applicant. The surveyor would be acceptable and an engineer would not be necessary. <br /> We don't need engineering calculations. <br /> John Derksen made a motion to rescind his motion, seconded by Mark Hallan. All <br /> members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded by John Derksen,to table this matter to <br /> the November Planning Commission meeting. All members voted"aye". Motion <br /> carried. <br /> APPLICANT: City of Pequot Lakes <br /> Applicant requests an Ordinance Amendment regarding Animal Husbandry <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report and that the City Clerk is working on other <br /> portions of the City Code relating to dogs. He also indicated she would like this <br /> application tabled this month to coordinate the regulation of dogs and cats in both <br /> portions of the City Code. Staff will meet with the City Clerk and bring back new <br /> language for consideration. <br /> Mayor Adams asked the Planning Commission for clarification of Animal Husbandry in <br /> the Rural Residential District. The Matrix indicates Animal Husbandry is a Conditional <br /> Use in the Rural Residential (RR) zone. There is a property owner who currently has <br /> horses in the RR zone and does not have a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Marohn <br /> explained that it is an existing use and if it were a new use, it would require a Conditional <br /> Use Permit. The use was existing at the time of the Sibley Township annexation. When <br /> the use goes away, it is no longer existing and would require a Conditional Use Permit. <br /> MINUTES 5 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> October 21, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.