Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Lind stated that the City had approved a Variance for Steve Caouette on Sibley Lake <br /> for a basement. The Planning Commission advised that Mr. Caouette met the setbacks. <br /> The Planning Commission looks at each application's merits. <br /> Rebuilding on existing footprint, bigger basement and increased height won't change the <br /> feel of the lot or the site; we need to move items out of the setback. We would have to <br /> set an impervious surface we are comfortable with. For an over the counter permit the <br /> impervious coverage would need to be at 20%; a Conditional Use Permit would be <br /> required to increase the impervious coverage to 25%. <br /> Mr. Lind stated he would need to discuss this with his wife. He needs asphalt on the hill <br /> and by the garage doors. <br /> The Planning Commission pointed out that there is a 30' X 40' area within the setback <br /> for the driveway or 1,200 square feet. If that is removed,the impervious coverage is <br /> down to approximately 27%. Mr. Lind would still need a stormwater management plan <br /> at 25%. <br /> The home could be built attached to the garage, and walk from the garage to the main <br /> level of the house with a walkout basement. <br /> Mr. Hallan stated he has no problem supporting a full basement on the existing footprint, <br /> but the applicant would need to develop a stormwater management plan to 25%. <br /> The Planning Commission offered the following options for the applicant to discuss with <br /> his wife: <br /> 1. Maintain the structure as it is, fix basement wall; <br /> 2. Put in the basement he wants, 2 feet higher, but bring the impervious coverage to <br /> 25%with a stormwater management plan. <br /> 3. Remove the house and build a new one within the building envelope while (a) <br /> bringing the overall impervious coverage down to 20% or(b) bring overall <br /> impervious coverage down to 25%with stormwater plan. <br /> Mr. Habein stated the City has lakes that all have small lots with elevation problems and <br /> buildings that are too close to the water, well inside the setbacks. He recommends we <br /> both try to compromise and come up with something workable for the applicant, option 2. <br /> The Staff Report should state the deck is within the lake setback, not along Pequot Blvd. <br /> Mr. Habein further stated he would be satisfied with 25% impervious coverage with a <br /> stormwater plan including swales and retention areas. The basement could be raised by 2 <br /> courses changing the size of the basement to that of the existing structure footprint. The <br /> dwelling needs a solid foundation and the footprint is not changing. <br /> Mr. Marohn explained that the Statutes say a City cannot deny the property owner the <br /> right to maintain what they have; it does allow the City to make reasonable conditions to <br /> MINUTES 4 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> October 21, 2010 <br />