9A - Minutes 021810 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The area of the dwelling that is being rebuilt is within the lake setback. Mr. Ogdahl stated the addition could possibly be canted and reduce the nonconformance with the lake setback. The 75-foot setback is not shown correctly on the survey. If they narrow structure they would be outside of setbacks. Roof would need to be higher to accommodate this. The Planning Commission recommended tabling the matter so the, pplcant could address the following: {rj t • Have the 75-setback from the OHW properly delinet n the plan; • Adjust the home as needed to stay out of the 75- set •' Have'sunroom setback so it is outside the 7540, ac ,. SOHW • Decrease setback on bluff(no net increase in iiiuff setback); • Modify elevation plan to show egress 1941 ow wells. A motion was made by Dean Williams, seconded b Naxk}Plffi llan,to table the is application for a redesign and clarification of setbacks All members voted"aye" Motion carried. ; ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO A. ND� �smess,Pet Da Care. s y OPEN FORUM: = roe .. NEW BU �'' ° a. a, "Xcs Polic Zoni, inistrator „ r expin'ed the Staff Report and requested direction from the Plannin fission ho ey wls ed to proceed. �ro The followin'' ents vure made. �o • The PI C0 ission member could state that it is his/her duty to ensure all Planning Co Vision members hear the same information and that he/she will bring the info ation to the meeting; • If a Planning Commission member repeats the information at a meeting,it may be interpreted that he/she agrees with it; • The Planning Commission member could state that anything said to the Planning Commission member,he/she has the responsibility to share it with the rest of the Planning Commission; • Save the information for the meeting; • The public should feel free to talk to any one,elected or appointed. We represent the people at large;they need to feel free to talk to us. Minutes 3 Pequot Lakes Planning Commission February 18,2010