My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9A - Minutes 021810
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
03-18-2010 Planning Commission Meeting
>
9A - Minutes 021810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2016 1:08:43 PM
Creation date
5/12/2016 1:08:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• It could be helpful from an applicant's point but in other situations it could be <br /> sticky. <br /> + The Planning Commission cannot provide an answer; submit the information at <br /> the meeting and a decision will be made <br /> • The Planning Commission cannot give an indication of the outcome when <br /> speaking with an applicant. <br /> • We don't want to create a rule for a situation that may only come up every eleven <br /> years. <br /> Commission Member Williams suggested the following: <br /> Under the Duties of the Board of Adjustment(Section 17-11 2 end ptanning <br /> Commission(Section 17-11.3) of the City Code,the foll ld be added: <br /> "In an effort to ensure the integrity of the Board, it is the deity o � Planning <br /> Commission to encourage the public to present their o i ,tints at t17 ime of the public <br /> hearings, either in writing or to testify in person <br /> The public hearing is where those comments occur' We need`to encotra e them <br /> g <br /> to show up at the public hearing. If they don't wain AoAl <br /> ;they can write a fetter <br /> rather than speak to the Planning Commission memb his could be an Ordinance <br /> Amendment;the City Attorney can reyicw it after next s meeting. <br /> till U�7� J <br /> b. Crow Wing County Ordinanci ti s n <br /> The Planning Commission had no commentso--" , nance'revisions. <br /> A z N <br /> c. Pet Day Car+ <br /> Mr. Marohn expl toff ha1eceived a request for a Pet Day Care in the Downtown <br /> Mixed Use zone hey uld#e no ovemight o`irding, only during the day. An <br /> Animal Boarding Faclli sos k `'ght or for an extended period of time and <br /> would be etd use D ' et Day Care may fall under the <br /> Comrner at Use, )t ,0' , qurri " Conditional Use Permit. Staff is requesting <br /> interpr�tlon from the Pining fission. <br /> °,1 21 <br /> The Flamilw- ommission', scussed the Form Based Code and how best to describe this <br /> type of use. 66 and nuisance standards would all apply. It was the Planning <br /> Commissions reca end a`tion to allow the Pet Day Care to move ahead without a CUP. <br /> 65, } <br /> OLD BUSINESS: <br /> a. Comprehensive Plan Discussion. <br /> i. Community Character <br /> Mr. Marohn stated that these Sections have been discussed and the Planning Commission <br /> can begin developing strategies. <br /> ii. Natural Resources <br /> Minutes 4 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> February 18,2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.