9A - Minutes 091511 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2. Make recommendation to the City Council to adopt the Code; or 3. Since we don't have a full Commission in attendance,think about it until next month. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to continue discussion at the October meeting. The Breezy Point Inspector, Scott Sedusky,was in attendance and will supply additional information and examples for next month. c. KC Companies Mr. Marohn explained that Tommy Woog,member of the Epp.,nomic Development Committee, has brought the facelift that KC Companies had done to his attention. KC Companies dicta phenomenal job renovating the storefront of their°°wilding along Front Street. That' sinvesting in the community. `RAN, d. Fleck Project Update,John Koupal—St� Finish,,, emodeling Mr. Koupal explained that he is asking permssio f k1ei odreplace the roof on the k1 F Fleck residence. It is a non-conforming structure f are eonstructing'a 50% addition. He stated the supporting piers for the porci�aioa had sunk- ��ioved them, dug down 5 feet and filled it with concrete. They are piers,not block f dation. He also stated he couldn't see the roof rafters until the sheetrgc 'ceiling`had been removed. Mr. Marohn stated coin ..;' ild a new structure in the exact dimensions. They can maintain and repay �;, fisting a also explained the statute changes. Removing and replacing the piers are ? es Or The wall 6 Ah h fide(por ea)will need to be reinforced; it will have new windows and headers. the fo a or the rest of the structure will not be reinforced; the 3 p eo are new. Mr. Marohn°e lamed there are only 2 options: 1. Follow tho conditions of the permit and City Code; or this project is done and their only oPon is to build a new house 75 feet back from the lake; 2. Acknowledge,we understand these plans;they are not major changes but are outside the spirit of the City Code. For this application it is not a huge difference and will not be more noticeable from the lake. It was the consensus to allow the reasonable option. However, homeowners should look ahead and do due diligence ahead of time to be sure structure is solid. Mr. Marohn explained that this action is an interpretation of the City Code, not a Variance request. They have the right to maintain the existing structure which would include replacement of the ceiling with equivalent roof truss system and a bearing wall on the outside lakeside wall, being consistent with Section 4 of the Code. Minutes 3 Pequot Lakes Planning Commission September 15, 2011