My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9A - Minutes 091511
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
10-20-2011 Planning Commission Meeting
>
9A - Minutes 091511
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2016 2:10:14 PM
Creation date
5/6/2016 2:10:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Both of the proposed properties have more than 6,250 square feet of buildable <br /> area.Neither Tract A nor Tract B would be constrained from future development. <br /> 3. Tract "A" contains two non-conforming structures. One of the non-conforming <br /> structures crosses the eastern property line and is approximately 3.26' into the <br /> public right-of-way. The other non-conforming accessory structure is <br /> approximately 6.62' from the south property line, while typically 10' is required. <br /> 4. Tract "B" contains a non-conforming accessory structure which is approximately <br /> 4.96 from the side property line while typically 10' is required. It also contains a <br /> conforming dwelling. <br /> 5. Tract "A" has approximately 13% impervious surface co erage while Tract "B" <br /> has approximately 29% impervious surface coverage are below the 40% <br /> maximum. <br /> 6. The property is suitable in its natural state for s tod purpose and this lot <br /> split would not be harmful to the health, safety, lfar e residents or of <br /> the community. <br /> 7. The subject property is currently served bythe municipal wate sewer system. <br /> Tract "A" is adjacent to the public sewct.and water system. It m ' _> onnected <br /> to the systems in the future. <br /> 8. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-used recreation. <br /> 9. Both tracts will conform to a minimum requirements of the Urban Residential <br /> Zone. <br /> 10. Lot layouts are compatible with g layout ofacijoining properties. <br /> 11. Both Tract A and Tract B mee vie frontage on public right-of-way <br /> requirement of 33 feet, ' <br /> subject to the follomi condltitin: , <br /> 1. The accessorytctur > ncraching i � the public right-of--way on Tract "A", <br /> shall owed. <br /> All m ers voted"a Motion=carried. <br /> >��v� <br /> b. Buildi odeEnforc r 'ant,Tom Nelson—Fire Chief <br /> Tom Nelson Chief, w present. He explained he hopes to persuade the City to <br /> adopt the Buil 'i ode a `n. He feels the City needs something for public safety,the <br /> citizens and the fir Ty ry <br /> The State of Minnes to follows the International Building Code and all contractors are <br /> required to build to that Code. Cities of more than 5,000 populations are required to <br /> administer the Code. The entire Code would need to be enforced, not just certain parts. <br /> Breezy Point administers the Code. Cities may contract with an individual or a company. <br /> There would be a fee structure. Municipalities with the Building Code have a higher <br /> value; there are higher interest rates and less growth without it. <br /> Vice-Chair Adams suggested the following: <br /> 1. Have the Fire Chief look over commercial plans; or <br /> Minutes 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> September 15, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.