My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05.01 - EDC Update
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2008
>
09-02-2008 Council Meeting
>
05.01 - EDC Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2014 10:17:11 AM
Creation date
10/20/2014 10:17:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
remains on its present alignment or an alternate alignment to the east is <br /> used), sooner or later, there will be a higher use for the land that is currently <br /> the City's spray irrigation field. <br /> 2). The present business/industrial park is nearing capacity and the City is <br /> working at adjustments to allow maximizing this present land. However, this <br /> is a shorter-term approach. More land will be needed if the City wants to <br /> encourage continued business/industrial growth. <br /> 3). Another shorter-term approach would be to extend sanitary sewer and <br /> watermain along Derksen Road from the south end of Morehouse Drive to <br /> service land on the north side of the spray irrigation field. Only platting off a <br /> row of lots in this area may only require a modification - and not a complete <br /> re-working of the State's permit to the City to operate the spray irrigation <br /> field. However, doing this without a bigger picture plan for the whole spray <br /> irrigation parcel would be shortsighted and could end up costing the City <br /> more expense. <br /> 4). To properly look at allowing development to occur on the present spray <br /> irrigation land and thus, to re-locate the spray irrigation facilities or come up <br /> with another method of disposing of the City's wastewater will require a <br /> Facility Plan. This is the name the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br /> (MPCA) uses for a study that looks long-term at major modifications to a <br /> City's wastewater system. <br /> 5). A Facility Plan, depending on the alternatives evaluated and on the <br /> MPCA's review time, can be a year-long process. <br /> 6). Design, obtaining funding assistance, land acquisition,bidding, and <br /> construction can add on another 2 to 5 years. The City should be prepared <br /> for a potential large project in the near or distant future. Failure to plan for <br /> an expansion could mean that the City could lose a large tenant. <br /> 7). Although these above time frames can sometimes be compressed, <br /> one cannot wait until we are at 99% capacity(which we are far from, <br /> fortunately) or until we need land next month or next year for economic <br /> expansion to begin the Facility Plan process. It requires some advance <br /> planning. <br /> 8). Although the City's wastewater treatment stabilization ponds and spray <br /> irrigation field are not yet approaching their capacity (currently at about <br /> 55%),the Commission feels it would be in the best interest of the City to <br /> complete the Facility Plan now rather than later. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.