My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11.01 - Req by Esther Fruth for Addtl Off-Sale Liq Lic
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2009
>
11-03-2009 Council Meeting
>
11.01 - Req by Esther Fruth for Addtl Off-Sale Liq Lic
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2014 11:51:36 AM
Creation date
6/19/2014 11:49:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OR <br />1. Years back the City adopted ordinances that two off -sale liquor <br />licenses are sufficient for Pequot Lakes. I would imagine they looked <br />at, and took into consideration the Minnesota statutes designed for <br />larger cities (classified as a population of 100,000 +). Those statues <br />mandate no more than one license per 5,000 of population. This <br />would seem to be a decent measure that cities with less than 100,000 <br />can turn to when determining their number of licenses per population. <br />With Pequot Lakes population around 2,000 the two current licenses <br />issued delivers a ratio of one per 1,000 of population or approximately <br />five times that of large city. <br />2. With that benchmark in mind, I thought I would look at a couple other <br />destination type communities so as to provide reference cities. <br />Alexandria, MN, with a population six times that of Pequot Lakes, <br />allows a total of three licenses. Walker, MN, whose population swells <br />in the summer, has one municipal license and feels that is sufficient <br />for their city. <br />3. What message would this send to the youth of our community? Pine <br />`— <br />River/Backus uses a billboard to promote their low percentage of high <br />schooler's who drink and they are proud of that fact. If this new <br />grocery operator is permitted a license there would be two liquor <br />stores stacked on top of each other at the door step of our community. <br />How does that serve the community? <br />4. Liquor is a controlled substance it is not like gas or groceries. A <br />controlled substance should be controlled for the better of the <br />community. This again begs the question; how will a third license <br />better our community? <br />5. The real question is, if two licenses have been sufficient for all of <br />these years, then why all of a sudden is it not enough now? As public <br />servants the number of licenses issued should only be expanded if <br />there is a true need and a benefit to the community. It certainly <br />shouldn't be offered as some form of an incentive to further attract a <br />new retail business to town. This particular retailer has already been <br />granted tax abatement money, which was hotly contested by the <br />community; do they really need or deserve an additional incentive? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.