Laserfiche WebLink
Dawn Bittner <br /> From: Blesener <jandjblesener@gmail.com> <br /> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 10:32 AM <br /> To: Dawn Bittner <br /> Cc: gregg gerhartz <br /> Subject: Proposed Amendments:Water Oriented Accessory Buildings and Guest Cottages <br /> Hi Dawn: <br /> Sorry for the late response, but these finro issues just came to our attention yesterday. Our comments <br /> are below. <br /> Water Oriented Accessory Structure <br /> We disagree with this proposed amendment. Accessory buildings should meet the same setbacks <br /> required for a primary dwelling. Otherwise accessory buildings could be sitting befinreen the dwelling <br /> and the lake, could be too visible from the lake and neighbor's views could be obstructed. <br /> Guest Cottages and Guest Quarters: <br /> We agree that these should both be allowed, but with some revisions to the proposed amendment <br /> language: <br /> • Reduce the required lot width from 180 feet to 100 feet. Large lots may not be 180' wide <br /> at the building setback line but may have substantial land behind that line, and a guest cottage <br /> could be constructed behind the primary dwelling. <br /> • Guest cottages/quarters should meet the same OHW and side yard setbacks as required <br /> of a primary dwelling <br /> • Only 1 (one) guest cottage or guest quarter per lot <br /> • The amendment should clarify that the 700 SF allowed for a guest cottage or guest <br /> quarter does not impact the 1250 SF currently allowed for an accessory building (typically a <br /> garage) on any lot. A guest cottage could be a third separate structure on the lot, while guest <br /> quarters could increase the size of an accessory building from 1250 SF to 1950 SF. <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to comment. <br /> Jann and Jack Blesener <br /> West Twin Lake <br /> Pequot Lakes, MN <br /> i <br />