My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning & Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2010
>
05-04-2010 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning & Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2014 10:06:27 AM
Creation date
4/21/2014 10:06:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. There will be no employees on site other than the owner or those residing in the <br />`- home. <br />5. Most sales will be done off -site or by mail. On -site retail sales will be by <br />appointment only. <br />6. There will be no items for sale that will be visible from the street. There will be <br />no visible evidence of a home occupation except for the sign requested by the <br />applicant. <br />7. There is no reason to believe there will be any nuisance problems of noise, <br />vibration, smoke, dust, fumes or litter from this proposed use. <br />8. Customers will only visit the home by appointment and then, only in limited <br />numbers. There is adequate parking on the property already for this modest level <br />of traffic. <br />9. The only equipment used will be limited in scale and scope and compatible with <br />normal household operations. <br />All members voted "aye ". Motion carried. <br />ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO AGENDA: <br />Add under New Business, 7 b, SuperValu Landscape Plan. <br />OPEN FORUM: None. <br />NEW BUSINESS: <br />a. SuperValu Sign Concept Plan Review, Leroy Signs - <br />Mr. Marohn explained that SuperValu was required to submit a sign plan for review by <br />the Planning Commission. The proposed signs meet all requirements of the code with the <br />exception that no signs are allowed on accessory structures. The canopy for the gas <br />pumps is an accessory structure. They would need approval for that by the Planning <br />Commission. The other signs meet the ordinance. Staff has not notified them that they <br />need a Conditional Use Permit for the signs on the canopy. <br />Chairman Woog asked what the ordinance says regarding size for the monument sign. <br />Staff read from the ordinance. Chairman Woog stated that the applicant had requested a <br />speed reduction south to Pillsbury Street. MN/DOT has submitted a letter stating that <br />they will look at reducing the speed in front of the new store once it is open. If the speed <br />is reduced there would be different sign parameters. <br />A motion was made by Tom Woog, seconded by Deb Brown, to approve the freestanding <br />sign at the 35 mph requirements where they are allowed up to 64 square feet of <br />freestanding sign and to approve the signs on the building fagade as presented. All <br />members voted "aye ". Motion carried. <br />Minutes <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />April 15, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.