Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Adams requested that anyone who signed the petition send a letter in writing stating <br /> their position. <br /> Council Member Ryan stated that the Planning Commission is studying whether it is appropriate <br /> for cities to continue to accept private roads due to the long range cost of maintenance. Council <br /> Member Nagel stated that the City would not be obligated to accept the road just because the <br /> road is paved. <br /> Del Anderson stated that, if the residents go through with the expense of paving the road, they <br /> would want it to be dedicated to the City. He stated that this would be one of the criteria to <br /> move forward with the assessment project. <br /> MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> JANUARY 4 2011 PEQUOT LAKES CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> 10.2.A. Wildlife Trail Status Update <br /> Tim Houle updated the Council on the status of the project. He noted that a petition was <br /> received to make Wildlife Trail a city street and to have it paved. Mr. Houle stated that the next <br /> step is for the Council to decide whether or not to proceed with the process.The Clerk handed <br /> out an updated map showing that 9 of the 16 parcels are opposed to the project and 4 of the 16 <br /> parcels are in favor of the project. <br /> Del Anderson—Wildlife Trail, expressed his frustration in that the City does not know the actual <br /> amount of the project because the bids have not been received.The Engineer stated that the <br /> City is following statutory guidelines for the special assessment statute. <br /> Brian Koslofsky—Wildlife Trail—thanked the Council and requested the Council to continue on <br /> with the improvements. He stated that there are over 50%of the residents are in favor of the <br /> project. <br /> 10.2.6. Wildlife Trail—En�ineering Proposal <br /> Council Member Sjoblad suggested that the property owners get the bids and questioned if the <br /> City could accept their bids and bypass the City Engineering process. <br /> Council Member Sjoblad questioned if a licensed engineer must be used for an assessment <br /> project. Tim Houle stated that if the project is going to be assessed the City must follow the <br /> state statute process. He noted that he could review the statutes and report back to the Council. <br /> COUNCIL MEMBER MALECHA MOVED TO TABLE THE ISSUE UNTIL THE CITY ENGINEER CAN <br /> PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE PROCESS. COUNCIL MEMBER RYAN SECONDED THE <br /> MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br />