My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.01 Planning Commission Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2017
>
11-07-2017 City Council Meeting
>
06.01 Planning Commission Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2017 12:23:24 PM
Creation date
11/2/2017 12:23:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
asked Mr. Schoeb if 25 units is an appropriate number. Mr. Schoeb concurred; that <br /> wouldn't be a problem. <br /> Planning Commission Member Hallan asked if the applicant plans to use the vacant lot <br /> as is;they are not bringing in any Class 5. Mr. Burslie stated the number of units is not <br /> a direct correlation to impervious coverage;the applicant does not plan for any <br /> impervious improvements. <br /> Public Comment Opened: <br /> Ken Henke,4239 Pillsbury Street— Mr. Henke stated he has no objection to the change <br /> to include U-Haul rental,but was curious as to why it wasn't there to begin with. Mr. <br /> Burslie explained this use was not part of the existing business and had not been <br /> included with the original Conditional Use Permit. <br /> Public Comment Closed. <br /> Planning Commission Member Hallan asked for clarification of Conditian Number i <br /> which states parking of trucks and trailers shall be along the north and south property <br /> lines. The north properry line currently is treed and Condition Number 2 states no <br /> existing trees shall be removed. Condition Number i should indicate trucks shall be <br /> parked along the south edge of the existing trees along the north property line. <br /> Planning Commissian Member Habein asked i�the screening could be shared by the <br /> City,the property owner to the west, and the applicant. Mr. Burslie stated the Planning <br /> Commission needs to just review this property. We can't require adjacent properties to <br /> screen. This is the time to address the screening for the use on this property. <br /> Mr. Schoeb inquired how many trees per foot are required. There are saplings along the <br /> north property line that could be moved. Mr. Burslie stated typically there is a planted <br /> height of 6 feet tall within 2 years. There may be twenty 6-foot trees required. Planning <br /> Commission Member Wallin sfated the distance along the west property line currently <br /> without trees is �2o feet. Mr. Burslie stated i2 trees would need to be planted. <br /> Mr. Schoeb asked what the timeframe would be to have them planted. Planning <br /> Commission Member Hallan stated we need to allow sufficient time for the planting to <br /> take place, possibly an 8 or 9 month period. <br /> It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that Condition Number 4 shall be a <br /> malcimum of 25 rental trucks/trailers allowed and Condition Number�shall require a <br /> total of twelve 6-foot evergreen trees shall be planted along the south �2o feet of the <br /> west property line. <br /> MINUTES 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> October i9, 201� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.