Laserfiche WebLink
Garage within setback: <br /> Andrew Boldt was present. His property is adjacent to the former Methodist <br /> Church. When he purchased the property in 1991, the previous owners and the <br /> Church stated that the tree line is the lot line. He applied for and received a <br /> permit to build a garage. The site plan indicated the garage would be six feet <br /> from the lot line. He built the garage 9 1/2 feet from the tree line. The former <br /> Church property was recently surveyed and the garage is within the setback, <br /> approximately one foot from actual lot line. <br /> Discussion followed regarding possible remedies to become conforming. An <br /> ATF Variance would not apply as there was no hardship, there was sufficient <br /> space to build the garage to the north. The best solution would be to purchase <br /> five feet from the new owner of the Church property. Mr. Boldt was requested to <br /> contact Ron Schaefer, new owner, to document his attempt to become <br /> conforming. Mr. Boldt was also directed to return to the Commission in March to <br /> notify the Commission of their agreement. <br /> NEW BUSINESS: <br /> Little Pine Properties, Metes and Bounds Subdivision. <br /> There was a lot of discussion regarding on-street parking. Parking issues will <br /> need to be addressed in the new Ordinance. This matter could be extended for <br /> another 60 days as parking is a valid concern. A decision needs to be made with <br /> the rules in place at this time. <br /> A motion by Joe Dotty, seconded by Bill Habein, to approve the metes and <br /> bounds subdivision. All members voted "aye". Motion carried. <br /> Note: The City will need to look into municipal off-street parking in the future. <br /> Gerald Foley, Metes and Bounds Subdivision. <br /> The newly created property must abut 33 feet of public right-of-way. This <br /> subdivision would create a lot that cannot be accessed. One option would be to <br /> extend the existing right-of-way (the unimproved right-of-way) through the <br /> properties. They would need to acquire some property. Another would be to <br /> have joint ownership of the road property by Tract A, Tract B and Wilderness <br /> Point Resort. A third option would be to deed the easement area to the City. <br /> Applicant requested that this matter be tabled for six months to allow time to <br /> research options. <br /> Highway 371 EIS: <br /> Planning Commission 4 <br /> January 15,2004 <br />