Laserfiche WebLink
5. Its compatibility with the objectives of the current Ordinance and its <br /> consistency with the current comprehensive land use plan. <br /> Further, the Ordinance directs that the Commission evaluate the effects of the proposed <br /> use on: <br /> 1. The prevention and control of water pollution, including sedimentation and <br /> nutrient loading. <br /> 2. Existing topography and drainage features and vegetative cover on the site. <br /> 3. The erosion potential of the site based upon the degree and direction of slope, <br /> soil type, and existing vegetative cover. <br /> 4. The need for the proposed use for a shoreland location. <br /> 5. The amount of liquid waste to be generated and the adequacy of the proposed <br /> sewage treatment system. <br /> 6. The visibility of structures and other facilities as viewed from public waters. <br /> 7. Adequacy of the site for water supply and on-site sewage treatment systems. <br /> 8. The types, uses, and numbers of watercraft that the project will generate in <br /> relation to the suitability of public waters to safely accommodate these <br /> watercraft. <br /> Staff Findings: We offer the following findings of fact for you to consider: <br /> 1. The applicant has submitted a home inspection report by a licensed building <br /> inspector. <br /> 2. There were no significant deficiencies reported. <br /> 3. The applicant has indicated that the structure is 10 years old. <br /> 4. According to the inspection report, the building is a modular building and is a <br /> good candidate for moving and being set on a new foundation. <br /> 5. The existing foundation is concrete block with a basement. There are no <br /> indications as to what the proposed foundation would be. <br /> 6. There is no landscaping proposed beyond planting of grass. <br /> 7. The location and size of neighboring homes has not been provided, but they <br /> are known to be of similar size and construction within the Field of Dreams <br /> subdivision. <br /> 8. The applicant has indicated that the home is to be used as a single family <br /> dwelling. <br /> 9. The proposal would have the dwelling moved onto the property within 12 <br /> months of approval. <br /> 10. There are no threats to the public health, safety and welfare identified with <br /> this proposal. <br /> 11. The site is located to facilitate this type of process being accessible primarily <br /> by County and State highways. <br /> 12. The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses, which are also single <br /> family residential. <br /> 13. The property is zoned Multi-Family residential. The proposed use is allowed <br /> in the MF zone and is consistent with the intent of the zone. <br /> 14. There are no significant concerns involving water pollution from this proposal <br /> and no state stormwater permits would be required. <br /> July 2004 Staff Report Page 7 <br />