Laserfiche WebLink
the correct zoning classification for this parcel? The primary place to determine the <br /> answer to these questions is by examining the City's vision as described in the future land <br /> use map contained in the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> From the current Ordinance, the Agricultural District is intended to allow traditional <br /> agricultural uses and conserve agricultural resources while allowing low density <br /> residential development compatible with agricultural uses. <br /> Rural Residential zoning includes residential areas developed at a density and character <br /> compatible with agricultural uses to maintain the rural character of the district. Planned <br /> Unit Developments or cluster developments are allowed as a Conditional Use Permit on <br /> lands that are suitable with the intent to maximize and preserve green space and historical <br /> features of the area. <br /> Staff Findings: This is a difficult application for a number of reasons. First and <br /> foremost, the applicant has made plans and commitments based on an erroneous <br /> understanding that a lot split could be easily done. Although that fact will not formally <br /> be part of any findings prepared by the Planning Commission, it certainly will be a factor <br /> if not with the Commission than certainly with the City Council. <br /> Another reason why this is a difficult application is that the difference between <br /> Agriculture zoning and Rural Residential zoning as presented with this case is subtle, but <br /> the implications of making the change are not. <br /> The current draft of the future land use map (shown on the following page)has not <br /> closely examined this area of the City, although the desired development pattern has been <br /> thoroughly discussed. Drawing heavily from the Sibley Township visioning session, the <br /> current draft of the comprehensive plan intentionally seeks to keep these areas as rural as <br /> possible. During the Township's planning process there was significant input from those <br /> in the Ag areas who feared encroaching development and how it would impact their <br /> ability to farm. Consistent with the current zoning that was established under that plan, <br /> the new plan calls for maintaining large agricultural lot sizes (20-40 acres) in areas that <br /> are currently rural and deforested. Those that are forested would remain in some type of <br /> forestry classification with lot sizes similar to the current 10 acres. <br /> The idea behind the Agriculture zoning classification is to conserve agricultural resources <br /> (See the previous section of this report). This would mean not just the current farms but <br /> also the ability for others to farm in the vicinity. A gradual transition from large-lot Ag <br /> and Forest classifications into smaller-lot residential lots seems to directly contradict both <br /> the Sibley Township plan and the current draft plan. <br /> While the notion of"doing just this one won't hurt"is difficult to argue against, the <br /> answer to the question, "Is this property zoned incorrectly?" is clearly no. The property <br /> was intentionally zoned Agriculture. Such zoning classification is consistent with the <br /> Sibley Township comprehensive plan, which was adopted by the City. The classification <br /> November Staff Report Page 4 <br />