My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09.05 - Facility Addition Feasibility Study
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2016
>
08-02-2016 Council Meeting
>
09.05 - Facility Addition Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2016 2:56:28 PM
Creation date
7/27/2016 2:56:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fabric dome shed versus stick-built salt shed. <br /> 4. Mention solar and ground source heat pump — reasons why or <br /> why not and the upfront costs associated with these in relation <br /> to the long-term benefits. <br /> 5. Clarify what the triggers are for taking care of present non- <br /> compliant items in the existing building. <br /> 6. In comparisons, pull out addressing the non-compliant items <br /> because they should be addressed sooner or later, even without <br /> a potential addition. <br /> 7. Have other departments weigh in on present and future space <br /> needs in the present building? In other words, do not add on so <br /> the Public Works is "set", and then find out the Fire <br /> Department thinks it will need more space in the present <br /> facility 5 years from now. <br /> 8. Future development has been talked about in the northwest <br /> quadrant of the new Hwy 371 — CSAH 11 interchange, east of <br /> the present City Hall facility and parcel. What might it consist <br /> of? Will public works operations at the present site really be <br /> detrimental to such future development? Is there no way to <br /> screen public works activities from future development? <br /> 9. Be clearer on how the need for sanitary sewer and watermain <br /> for future development in the northwest quadrant of the new <br /> Hwy 371 — CSAH 11 interchange, east of the present City Hall <br /> facility and parcel, might impact the need for sanitary sewer <br /> and water service for an expanded Maintenance Facility. <br /> 10. Where did the 9,000 square feet for a new facility come from? <br /> What are the present pieces of equipment that would be <br /> housed in a building? What are the future equipment needs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.