Laserfiche WebLink
- Sf?NDELIN LRW OFFICE ID :2185688444 FEB 03 '04 15 :22 No .001 P .03 <br /> SAMEMN LAW OFFICE <br /> Page 2 <br /> February 3,2004 <br /> location of highways and streets. For the same reasons that many business owner's <br /> prefer a through town option I think the same could be said for residential property <br /> owners; that is maintaining everyone's c xpectation that Highway 371 would be <br /> located through town. That is the expectation everyone made when they decided to <br /> locate where they currently are. A bypass would defeat that expectation and <br /> investment. <br /> • Potentially cost savings with the through town option could be use by hopefully the <br /> State and the City to improve the aesthetics of the Highway through town to make it <br /> more attractive. St. Paul would be a good example, although on a larger scale, of a <br /> City maintaining its look and feel while also improving a much larger interstate, <br /> l=lighway 358. <br /> • The City currently is in need of upgrading and improving accesses and intersections, a <br /> chief complaint of some in favor of a bypass, and a through town option would give <br /> the City the ability in conjunction with working with MnDot to accomplish this goal. <br /> • A through town option is a known quantity, should be less expensive, and maintains <br /> the expectations of both commercial and residential properly owners. In my opinion <br /> it should be viewed as an opportunity rather than a negative. <br /> I think that a bypass option is a risky and less desirable option for the City as a whole for a <br /> number ofreasons; <br /> • A bypass option has several unknowns. There is no guarantee that the land around a <br /> bypass will not develop in a commeroial fashion. Although the City may intend to <br /> zone the property to prevent this, the City cannot prevent future City Councils from <br /> changing the zoning. Commercial development along the bypass would certainly not <br /> meet the expectations of those residential property owners that would abut the bypass <br /> and it will promote sprawl and noise. <br /> • Commercial development will occur along a bypass and will have a negative impact <br /> on businesses in town. if the City truly wants to give consumers a reason to come to <br /> town and shop a bypass will defeat that goal. I do not believe it is the intention of the <br /> City Council to see many commercial businesses and jobs relocate new the bypass or <br /> simply cease to exist. Further if businesses move or cease to exist that will have a <br /> detrimental impact on the current core business district of the City and the City tax <br /> base. <br /> • They bypass will have a negative impact on the City's identity. <br /> • Although 1 am not sure of the "final layout"of the bypass it could have a detrimental <br /> impact on current County Road and City Street accesses to town, For example, many <br /> people access Pequot Lakes from County Road 112. A bypass could certainly have a <br /> negative impact on that access to town as well as any other existing access to town. <br />