Laserfiche WebLink
1. The property is properly zoned Downtown Mixed Use and is suitable in its natural <br /> �- state for commercial and residential uses as permitted in the DMU zone, as the <br /> property currently is being used for residential purposes. <br /> 2. There are not any significant natural features, such as steep slopes or wetlands, <br /> that would constrain future development on these properties. <br /> 3. The two structures located on this property are conforming as they meet all <br /> required setbacks and the total impervious falls under the 50%maximum allowed. <br /> 4. Each of the lots in the subdivision currently has access to sanitary sewer services. <br /> 5. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation as these <br /> properties are not adjacent to any water bodies. <br /> 6. All lots meet the minimum buildable lot size of 2,25 ' e feet in the DMU <br /> zone, with Tract A being 6,008 square feet and Tract- eing 9,016 square feet. <br /> 7. All lots meet the minimum lot width of 25 feet, A being 60.01 feet and <br /> Tract B being 90.02 feet,the smallest boundary th on rner lot. <br /> 8. All the lots meet the impervious coverage\� '30% for DMU zone, with <br /> Tract A currently vacant and Tract B hav rt roughly 15/o cove <br /> 9. The proposed lot layouts are compa with th existing lay djoining <br /> properties and the proposed lot lines are lel erpendicular existing lot <br /> lines. Future development will not be constr ' y the proposed lot layouts. <br /> 10. The proposed side lot line i at right angles a existing road line and the <br /> property line of the adjacent <br /> 11. Both Tract A and B meet yq um from public right-of-way <br /> requirement of 33 feet, each having"mor" 0 feet�`� <br /> �. F.. <br /> All members voted"ayn carried. �y H <br /> \' ;%' { <br /> APPLICANT: Elizab i lular Od <br /> Applicant ts,. erm \ to �� , e use of a Temporary Sign. <br /> Staff ex e eA to a temporary permit and the applicant's request for an <br /> indef extension lanm smmission stated that the 14-day exempt sign,plus <br /> the 60- xtension w !'"are thdequate time to install a permanent sign on the <br /> building further exte n allowed beyond the 60-day extension. <br /> di <br /> pw <br /> a / <br /> OLD BUSINES�.�, <br /> Administrative Fin & Fine Designation on Fee Schedule. <br /> Staff pointed out the andout from Chief Braam and explained that a final draft will be <br /> submitted in December. <br /> Future Road Plan: <br /> The City Engineer has not responded to comments regarding conflicts with Comp Plan. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 8 <br /> November 16, 2006 <br />