07 - Planning and Zoning Monthly Report

Home Browse Search

3. The two structures located on these properties are conforming as they meet all `.. required setbacks and the total impervious falls under the 15%maximum allowed. 4. Both Tract A and B currently have on-site septic treatment systems. Municipal sewer services are not available to these properties. 5. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation as these properties are not adjacent to any water bodies. 6. Neither Tract A or Tract B meets the minimum buildable lot size of five acres for the RR zone. The proposed subdivision, however, would reduce the nonconformity of these parcels, reducing the total number of parcels and increasing the size of the southern tracts by 10,000 square et each. 7. Neither tract meets the minimum lot width of 200 feet, properties are 100 feet wide. These parcels had pre-existing at this 1 dth, and the subdivision does not propose to reduce the existing width of e'1r ;A 8. Both lots meet the impervious coverage limit of % for zone, with Tract A having approximately 15% and Tract B h rd ghly 1 verage. 9. The proposed lot layouts are compatib - th the existing t of adjoining properties as the proposed subdivision ks to e end the lengt existing southern tracts to encompass the area`" the , ern existm arcel. The proposed lot lines are parallel and perpe to existing lot lines. Future development will not be cons timed by the pro lot layouts. 10. The proposed side lot line i t angles to'` .existing road line and the property line of the adjacent pr \ ,, 11. Both Tract A and B meet t' mi fronta - on public right-of-way requirement of 33 feet, each havm All members voted" e". ` carried �p�� Zoning alo, sed a d tov Council age ' tha Council had met the night before with a representative of Tan the C '`ill was ed that the property along the route would need to r d. Currentl / Comm' cial zone extents east along the north side of County Rd 1 to the Fir oweproperty, on the west side of the future road. Mr. Hallan remi "' everyone t we must look at what we want the flavor to be twenty to thirty years fr o nw. e is Commercial zoning at each end of the bypass route and in the middle,wlu` °ugh. There is no intent to rezone all along the bypass. The Planning Commissio oes not wish to expand Commercial zones at this time. APPLICANT: Ron Schaefer, Little Pine Investments Applicant requests a Metes and Bounds Subdivision. Ms. Barajas explained the Staff Report. A motion was made by Roger Varilek, seconded by Mark Hallan,to approve the metes and bounds subdivision,based on the following Findings of Fact: Planning Commission Minutes 7 November 16, 2006