Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Memo <br /> September 20,2006 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> important, especially with the contours/terrain of the land coupled with the very narrow <br /> R/W's previously allowed by P&Z. If this had been a City initiated or special assessment <br /> project, we would not have even considered using bituminous gutter. <br /> Sheet No. 4, Water and Sewer Details <br /> • External manhole adjustment ring seals, Infi-Shield or approved equal, have been used on <br /> recent sanitary sewer installations in the City of Pequot Lakes. We would recommend their <br /> use on this project as well. <br /> • There does not appear to be any provision for locating sanitary sewer services in <br /> accordance with the latest Minnesota Statutes. <br /> Sheet No. 6 thru 9, Plan and Profile <br /> • There does not appear to be 10 feet of separation between sanitary sewer and water <br /> services as is required by Minnesota Department of Health regulations (sheets 6-8 of 22). <br /> • Intersections at Trailside Road / C.R. 112 and Trailside Road /Trailside Loop do not appear <br /> to meet the ordinance requirements for approach grades. The ordinance requires grades no <br /> greater than 2% within 50 feet of an intersection and 7% within 200 feet (sheet 8 of 22). <br /> • While there does not appear to be a feasible alternative, watermain and forcemain are being <br /> directional drilled in very close proximity to natural gas mains and services. We recommend <br /> very close coordination with the natural gas utility when performing these operations (sheet <br /> 9 of 22). <br /> Specifications <br /> ■ In addition to the air and deflection testing listed in SPEC 109, the City will require that the <br /> sanitary sewer lines be televised. <br /> Engineer's Estimate <br /> • We have made a spot check, as opposed to a line by line review, of the quantities and they <br /> appear to be correct. <br /> • We checked the unit prices against other recent projects in the area and, for the most part, <br /> they appear reasonable. <br /> • It appears that the cost split for 10" watermain has been calculated at 50% for the City's <br /> share, or$32.50 per lineal foot. Our understanding of the previous agreement is that the <br /> developer would pay for an open cut 6" diameter watermain complete in place and the City <br /> would pay for the material cost associated with increasing the diameter to 10", which we <br /> would estimate at approximately $8.00 per lineal foot (not$32.50 per foot). <br /> Do not hesitate to contact Mike Rude at (218) 316-3663 or Tim Houle at (218) 316-3646 should you <br /> have any questions or comments regarding this review. <br />