My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04 - Rate Study
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2007
>
10-16-2007 Council Meeting
>
04 - Rate Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2016 2:41:23 PM
Creation date
6/27/2016 2:41:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
sewer fund would not meet its capital reserve even if depreciation were <br /> excluded from the calculation. See Exhibit E for a graph depicting capital <br /> reserve requirements and potential cash shortages. <br /> Utility customers typically regard their fee increases for water and sewer in total. The <br /> attached Exhibit A shows the projected combined increase in utility fees and hook-up <br /> fees charges needed to maintain minimum cash balances. <br /> Findings <br /> The recommended connection and user fees do need to increase over time for the <br /> following reasons: <br /> 1) Capital costs have been projected for the sanitary sewer system, with the <br /> expectation of an expanded facility in 2009. <br /> 2) The City has previously agreed to credit the developer a total of$164,563 from <br /> future connection fees for project costs the developer undertook to perform. This <br /> has been split 50150 between the water and sewer fund. <br /> 3) A slow-down in the housing market has slowed the anticipated pace of growth <br /> from the developer's projections. Coupled with the credit described above,the <br /> City is relying on connection fees to pay for roughly 14%of the construction <br /> costs for the treatment plant expansion. Water connection fees represent 1.6%of <br /> the water distribution system,which includes the Industrial Park area, the hydrant <br /> project and the Highway 371 realignment. <br /> Recommendation #1: Update the rate study at least every 2 years to update capital <br /> projects, monitor trends and adjust rates accordingly. <br /> Recommendation #2: Institute the proposed monthly meter charges shown in order to <br /> provide a funding source for the cost of replacing and maintaining meters. From <br /> discussions with staff, it appears that there is no charge if an existing meter fails and <br /> needs to be replaced. Meters also become less efficient over time and the usage shown on <br /> the meter may not reflect the actual usage. Or, in other words, the charges being <br /> calculated from an old meter may not be accurate. <br /> As was stated above, special assessments were levied for the original industrial park. The <br /> study contemplates an estimate for special assessment revenue. Research and institute a <br /> special assessment process for the Industrial Park area expansion. <br /> Recommendation #3: The City currently has approximately 20 addresses that have either <br /> or both an unmetered water and sanitary sewer usage. Included in the 20 accounts are two <br /> apartments and church and 4 commercial properties, with the balance as residential <br /> usage. <br /> The current charge of$20 per month equals a little over 2,500 gallons per month usage. <br /> From a summary that staff completed which analyzed the number of residential users at <br /> different water usage levels, it appears that little over 50%of the City's 224 residential <br /> users use less than 3,000 gallons per month. Most of the City's residential users use more,. <br /> 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651)697-8500 Fax:(651)697-8555 <br /> Roseville,MN 55113-1105 http://www.ehlers-inc.com <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.