My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8A - Minutes 092007
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
10-18-2007 Planning Commission Meeting
>
8A - Minutes 092007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2016 11:56:10 AM
Creation date
6/15/2016 11:56:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A motion was made by John Derksen, seconded by Tom Adams, to approve the Highway <br /> 371 Alternate Route Study Group Report, with clarification of the items in Part I, and <br /> pass on to the City Council with the recommendation evident in the summary. <br /> Discussion: <br /> Mr. Woog stated the following: "I would like to say thanks to the City Council, to the <br /> Planning Commission, and to the community at large and to all those who gave testimony <br /> who were asked to. There was a lot of technical information required that will have <br /> significant impact. There is no doubt it has been exhaustive to our community and to <br /> take it with the weight it carries and the divisive nature of the pro s. I know there are <br /> people on both sides of the issue that have very strong feelings ei r case. I know <br /> there is another piece of information the City Council is wo on with the Chamber of <br /> Commerce and I know they have concluded one portion a survey. I would <br /> like to have that stated so that we know that the Boone '"'" the Ca '1 can come to a <br /> decision and if Mn/DOT can get their act together 1, ere wil\ me sort of <br /> decision made for the community so that they c flan, so that the co \ \ty can plan, <br /> so they know with certainty how to plan for ture gr , whether i ttsmess <br /> related or community related types of activities. <br /> We do appreciate all the work and eff put in not spec" ly to the Planning <br /> Commission and to the City Council, as obviousl part, but to the public <br /> and those who took part in this whether„ uIt for the e here—it was difficult <br /> to sit in meetings sometimes,but we wan d to 001's at was clear and able to <br /> be followed along with the blic and I thi wave' mat. We can't treat this <br /> lightly and we realize a included' rem is v important data for this <br /> community. It is a intere' point in o history." <br /> Further discussion: Shoe art the Executive Summary? No, the <br /> ii <br /> survey is;]n e sc doc' "he data in the summary relates to <br /> economy'. uestiorf' s addressing additional,unanswered questions. The <br /> surve '�ould be corn by ber 15. <br /> The quests ;'ncluded in \\' rep rt better represent the people in the community. <br /> M nee \ " finish t ; ; IS. This report is not a binding document. It is a summary <br /> of data collecte 7o months of meetings. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTER` r. Habein: Aye; Mr. Adams: Aye; Mr. Derksen: Aye; Mr. <br /> Williams: Nay; Mr\\Hallan: Aye. Motion carried. 4— 1. <br /> b. Height Limits in the Light Industrial District: <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. There have been 2 requests for variances over <br /> the past several months for accessory structure height. The Planning Commission would <br /> like to discuss the following at the next meeting: <br /> 1. Increase height for structures that are not occupied, such as equipment. <br /> 2. Have some type of limitation, say 35feet. <br /> Minutes 9 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> September 20, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.