My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3C - Variance for a Structure Exceeding the Height Limit
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
05-17-2007 Planning Commission Meeting
>
3C - Variance for a Structure Exceeding the Height Limit
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2016 9:53:40 AM
Creation date
6/15/2016 9:53:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Setback, right-of-way, City road—feet, minimum...............................................30 <br /> • Setback, right-of-way, County road—feet,minimum..........................................30 <br /> • Setback, side yard—feet,minimum.....................................................................30 <br /> • Setback,parking from lot line—feet, minimum ...................................................10 <br /> • Impervious surface—percent,maximum..........................................................50% <br /> • Building height—feet,maximum......................................................................... 25 <br /> Section 5.13, Subdivision 4B indicates that the use shall be compatible with the surrounding <br /> neighborhood and that uses shall not present noise, odor,light, or any other nuisances. <br /> Section 11.7 contains provisions regarding the review of variance applications and directs the <br /> Planning Commission to make a decision on a variance request with consideration for the <br /> following factors: <br /> 1. The strict interpretation of the Ordinance would create undue hardship,and <br /> 2. The strict interpretation of the Ordinance would be impractical because of circumstances <br /> relating to lot size, shape, topographic, or other characteristics of the property not <br /> created by the land owner, and <br /> 3. The deviation from the Ordinance with any attached conditions will still be in keeping <br /> with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance, and <br /> 4. The variance will not create a land use not permitted in the zone, and <br /> 5. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality, and <br /> 6. The variance is not for economic reasons alone, but reasonable use of the property does <br /> not exist under the Ordinance. <br /> Staff Findings: The Staff provides the following findings of fact for consideration by the <br /> Planning Commission: <br /> 1. The proposed use meets the required setbacks, with the proposed structure being at least <br /> 30 feet from all property lines. <br /> 2. The proposed use meets the required impervious coverage limit of 50%, proposing 41.3% <br /> of the lot area as impervious surface. <br /> 3. The proposed manufacturing building meets the building height limit of 25 feet, being <br /> approximately 23.5 feet as measured by the Ordinance standards. The dust collector, <br /> however,measures 28 feet in height. <br /> 4. Strict interpretation of the Ordinance would create an undue hardship on this business, <br /> as the business would not be able to operate in the City without the required dust <br /> collector to meet OSHA standards. Dust collectors are purchased from third party <br /> manufacturers and the dust collection unit that the applicants require is manufactured at <br /> 28 feet in height. <br /> 5. While there are not any characteristics of the land itself that prevent this property from <br /> being developed with most other industrial uses, strict interpretation of the Ordinance, <br /> in this case, would be impractical because of the pre-manufactured height of a required <br /> unit for a wood-working industrial operation. <br /> 6. The deviation from the Ordinance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Ordinance, which is to limit the general height of structures for aesthetic and fire safety <br /> purposes. This property, located in the Business Park, is surrounded by similarly <br /> designed principle structures. The proposed principle structure meets the required <br /> height limit, but as measured from the ground to the peak, is actually taller than the <br /> requested dust collector unit. <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 3-2 <br /> May r7,2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.