Laserfiche WebLink
2. The proposed rezoning to Shoreline Residential is consistent with the Future Land <br /> Use Map, which designates the area adjacent to the shore as Shoreline <br /> Residential. <br /> 3. The proposed rezoning to Shoreline Residential meets the compatibility <br /> requirements in that the properties are adjacent to the Water Resource zone. <br /> 4. The subject property meets the purpose and intent of the Shoreline Residential <br /> district: to provide a district for riparian residential development. <br /> 5. Each of the properties meets the minimum lot size requirement of 20,000 square <br /> feet for the Shoreline Residential zone, with each property being 29,000 square <br /> feet or greater. �� <br /> 6. Both properties meet the minimum lot width stan*,. 100 feet for the <br /> Shoreline Residential zone, each being 100 feet wid <br /> 7. Rezoning to Shoreline Residential would be c a with the surrounding <br /> zoning classifications as the adjoining property to the t and east are also <br /> Shoreline Residential and the property to y„ h of nad is Shoreline <br /> Commercial. <br /> 8. Rezoning these properties entirely to��reline Residential woul ,constitute a <br /> down-zoning as these properties were preusly he Residents with similar <br /> provisions governing their use. <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion c <br /> 1 <br /> � , <br /> APPLICANT: Ci Z*4 akestY V7 Applicant requests I one lm Rural idential to Rural Residential. John <br /> Johnson, prope oc r,Parl No.: 2903 � 2C00009. <br /> j\ F <br /> Applicant w esent'" ' ned the Staff Report. This parcel is within <br /> the Wilde sst Sta �dicated t at the Open Space will need to be rezoned at <br /> a fu ate in the ess ' t. <br /> 0- : \ <br /> A motion '; ;made by Jo erk en, seconded by Roger Varilek, to recommend <br /> rezoning thi � �� el to Sho ine Commercial, based on the following Findings of Fact: <br /> 1. The rezone ,mural Residential is consistent with the City's Comprehensive <br /> , <br /> Plan, which icates that Rural Residential areas contain development patterns <br /> that are low'density residential, not served by municipal utilities, and containing <br /> limited demand for accessibility and new roads. <br /> 2. Neither the rezoning to Rural Residential nor to Shoreline is not consistent with <br /> the City's Future Land Use Map, which designates this area as future Forest <br /> Preservation. <br /> 3. The proposed rezoning to Rural Residential meets the compatibility requirements <br /> in that the property is established near Shoreline Residential uses. The Ordinance <br /> does not indicate whether the Rural Residential zone is compatible with the <br /> Shoreline Commercial zone. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 9 <br /> December 14, 2006 <br />