Laserfiche WebLink
than one with another design. Our Ordinance discourages development of these types of <br /> properties. Rezoning and a Rural Conservation Subdivision were also discussed. <br /> A motion was made by Bill Habein, seconded by Roger Varilek,to recommend approval <br /> of the Preliminary Plat of Mayo Acres, based on the following Findings of Fact: <br /> 1. The land in the proposed development is properly zoned Forest Management as <br /> the majority of the property currently contains tree cover. The land is suitable in <br /> its natural state for the proposed development with minimum alteration. <br /> 2. The land does not contain natural features that will sign cantly constrain future <br /> development on the property. The land is generally d forested, with a <br /> portion of a wetland located in the far southeast ortion of Lot 4 of the <br /> property. <br /> 3. The property is not adjacent to public sewer, bu e app has show that each <br /> property has sufficient room to acco o on �' septic treatment <br /> systems. <br /> 4. The proposed subdivision does not co proviso ns for water- creation <br /> as non of the properties contains direct ac to a is water. <br /> 5. Each of the proposed lots meets the mini. .€, size�of 10 acres for the Forest <br /> m <br /> Management zone, with each;;beg 10 acres in Each property also meets the <br /> minimum buildable lot area es, with each '' 'ng more than five acres of <br /> buildable area as the only con L eature is to in the far southeastern <br /> corner of Lot 4 (the wetland). <br /> �., 6. Each of the proposed lots meets th ;mull th of 300 feet for the Forest <br /> g ''; peach havenleast 33Q,, eet of width. <br /> Management zo <br /> ✓ems � �, <br /> 7. The propose of layo „y e compat \le with the existing layout of surrounding <br /> properties;. ' similar those on th eft side of 9 `Avenue SW. <br /> 8. The proposed si t at right ogles with existing roads and are similar <br /> Affill to t},\ _ mg o �tG wes Avenue SW. <br /> 9. � " ur 1 d entfit,y zone is compatible with the Agriculture, Forest <br /> anagement, ition dential, and Recreation Zones. <br /> lot meets th' _inim 1equirement of 33 feet of fronta a on a public right- <br /> 0 - `� with each���mg more than 300 feet of frontage on 7Avenue SW. <br /> 11. The ��� cant hasgposed designating the western 26.5 feet of the property as <br /> 0 -� for 91,�INAvenue SW. The road currently does not have any right-of- <br /> way desigrf mid the western half of the road falls in Loon Lake Township in <br /> Cass County. <br /> 12. While the applicant has not shown any proposed future driveways, Mike Loven of <br /> the Roads and Streets department has advised that the future property owner of <br /> Lot 1 place their driveway south of the bend in the road to the north. Also, no <br /> culverts will be needed for driveways as the area is generally flat. <br /> subject to the following condition: <br /> 1. A deed restriction shall be placed on Lot One that would limit access to the <br /> property to the southern 75 feet of the parcel. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 3 <br /> December 14,2006 <br />