8A - Minutes 121406 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. The proposed rezoning to Shoreline Residential meets the compatibility requirements in that the properties are adjacent to the Water Resource zone; the compatibility requirements state that the zone should extend through the first tier of parcels to a public road,or 500 feet from the OHW, whichever is closer to the water body. In this case, the public road, Front Street, is the nearest public road which is roughly 500 feet from the OHW. 4. The subject property meets the purpose and intent of the Shoreline Residential district to provide a district for riparian residential development. 5. The property meets the minimum lot size requirement of 20,000 square feet for the Shoreline Residential zone, being nearly 10 acres in si with roughly 3 acres falling within the proposed Shoreline Residential zone.. 6. The property meets the minimum lot width standard 00 feet for the Shoreline Residential zone, being more than 200 feet wide. °1, 7. Rezoning a portion of the property adjacent to S e Hig 371 to Commercial would not be compatible with the Future a map " designates this area as future Rural Residential in character 8. A rezoning of the portion of the pr e along the Highway ercial would be compatible with the surround- ing� Knimercial fications asadjoining '6 properties to the north and south are curren , ' and have been developed as such. j 9. Rezoning the eastern portion e properties , ommercial would meet the compatibility requirements for ercial dis�� the subject properties would serve as a buffer bet en fir, -intens �\ commercial areas and surrounding residential districts./10. Rezoning the eat ortion of se prope oes to Commercial would not `' constitutes zoning adjoining operties are currently zoned Commercial and prope the e ide of the ay are also Commercial. The western boundary of the, rty i_�a line between the eastern boundary of the ont an�� rn boundary of the lot to the south of the s pct r' \\ p �s 1 ezoning these/%"' opert rely to Shoreline Residential would constitute -zoning as t ese prop es were previously zoned Commercial along State i y 371. The ty has"sought to avoid down-zoning unless requested by the prop wner. All members vote ', Motion carried. APPLICANT: Brian Pahl. Applicant requests Preliminary Plat of Mayo Acres. Applicant was represented by Kris Wroolie of Kramer, Leas, Deleo. Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report and that the applicant is aware of the Park Dedication Fee. Finding of Fact No. 12 states where the driveway should be located in Lot One and should be included as a Condition. The Planning Commission discussed whether our Ordinance is handicapping a better design. There are four accesses onto the road,rather Planning Commission Minutes 2 December 14, 2006