Laserfiche WebLink
COMMUNITYGROWTH Ci of <br /> 1 N S T 1 7 U T E Noott <br /> Kvtwrts in Sr udl Tmv Planning �+ <br /> likely recommend a 30400t wide easement, upon which no permanent <br /> structures could be built. <br /> - I get nervous about having a structure over any kind of sanitary sewer and <br /> watermain line.I know the existing sanitary sewer service line is shown going <br /> under the existing garage in the proposed Tract B. I also understand from <br /> your comment below that there will be a utility easement across the proposed <br /> Tract A to the proposed Tract B - I presume for this sanitary sewer service <br /> line. Is there a chance that Tract B will be under separate ownership than <br /> Tract A sometime in the future? If so,even with an easement, having a <br /> structure that will be somebody else's property sitting on top of someone <br /> else's private sanitary sewer service line may not be a desirable situation. <br /> - The previous un-split property has frontage on Old Highway 371,which has a <br /> City watermain in it. The proposed Tract B will now be separated from this <br /> with the new proposed Tract A still fronting along the Old Highway 371 and <br /> its corresponding water service.Will this be an issue for Tract B. <br /> - Will the easement(s) be just on these drawings or will they be recorded with <br /> these property parcel numbers? If they are recorded, as well as drawn, it <br /> would help communicate to all future owners what is where. <br /> Also, a potential gap in the title exists between the subject property and the City pond <br /> parcel. Staff has addressed this issue with Pat Trottier of Landecker and Associates and <br /> he has stated that for this lot split the gap is not a concern. The property owners or City <br /> may want to address this as a separate issue at a later date. <br /> Applicable Regulations: The purpose and intent of the Downtown Mixed Use Zoning <br /> District is to provide a zoning classification for a mix of high-density residential and <br /> commercial uses. Development in this zone relies less on automobile traffic and more on <br /> walking, biking and other similar modes of transportation. Infrastructure must be in <br /> place to provide on-street parking and walkways as well as connection to municipal <br /> water and sanitary sewer utilities. Downtown Mixed-Use zones should be clustered to <br /> provide the maximum amount of interaction and accessibility between the different <br /> establishments. <br /> Applicable Lot Size/Dimension Standards for the DMU Zone: <br /> Lot width—feet,minimum 25 <br /> Buildable lot area—square feet, minimum 2,250 <br /> Maximum Density units per acre 20 <br /> Setback, right of way, City road- feet, minimum 1 <br /> Setback, right of way, County or State road, feet, minimum 10 <br /> Setback, side yard—feet, minimum 0 <br /> Setback, rear—feet,minimum 10 <br /> Setback, sign—feet, minimum 1 <br /> Setback,parking from building or lot line —feet,minimum 0 <br /> Setback,wetland—feet,minimum 50 <br /> Impervious Coverage with storm sewer available 900/( <br /> Impervious Coverage without storm sewer available 50% <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report 7(a)-2 <br /> September 18,20o8 <br />