Laserfiche WebLink
with design guidelines or general statements of policy, Form-based codes are <br /> regulatory, not advisory. <br /> Form-based codes are drafted to achieve a community vision based on time-tested <br /> forms of urbanism. Ultimately, a Form-based code is a tool; the quality of <br /> development outcomes is dependent on the quality and objectives of the <br /> community plan that a code implements. <br /> The same organization lists some advantages of form-based codes. <br /> Eight Advantages to Form-Based Codes <br /> 1. Because they are prescriptive (they state what you want), rather than <br /> proscriptive (what you don't want), form-based codes (FBCs) can achieve a <br /> more predictable physical result. The elements controlled by FBCs are those <br /> that are most important to the shaping of a high quality built environment. <br /> 2. FBCs encourage public participation because they allow citizens to see what <br /> will happen where-leading to a higher comfort level about greater density,for <br /> instance. <br /> 3. Because they can regulate development at the scale of an individual building <br /> or lot, FM encourage independent development by multiple property <br /> owners. This obviates the need for large land assemblies and the <br /> megaprojects that are frequently proposed for such parcels. <br /> 4. The built results of FM often reflect a diversity of architecture, materials, <br /> uses, and ownership that can only come from the actions of many independent <br /> players operating within a communally agreed-upon vision and legal <br /> framework. <br /> S. FBCs work well in established communities because they effectively define <br /> and codify a neighborhood's existing "DNA." Vernacular building types can <br /> be easily replicated, promoting infill that is compatible with surrounding <br /> structures. <br /> 6 Non-professionals find FBCs easier to use than conventional zoning <br /> documents because they are much shorter, more concise, and organized for <br /> visual access and readability. This feature makes it easier for nonplanners to <br /> determine whether compliance has been achieved <br /> 7. FBCs obviate the need for design guidelines, which are difficult to apply <br /> consistently, offer too much room for subjective interpretation, and can be <br /> difficult to enforce. They also require less oversight by discretionary review <br /> bodies, fostering a less politicized planning process that could deliver huge <br /> savings in time and money and reduce the risk of takings challenges. <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report 6(a)-2 <br /> December 11,2oo8 <br />