My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6A - Grow Zone Amendments
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
12-11-2008 Planning Commission Meeting
>
6A - Grow Zone Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2016 1:29:41 PM
Creation date
6/10/2016 1:29:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMUNITYGROWTH <br /> Wrfs in .mall T`rruw Planning <br /> g <br /> x> <br /> STAFF REPURT <br /> Application: Grow Zone Ordinance Changes <br /> Agenda Item:6(a) <br /> Background Information and Discussion: When we last talked about changes to <br /> the DMU district and the concept of creating a "Grow Zone", I discussed work <br /> Community Growth Institute was doing internally to create alternative zoning <br /> regulations that would be a good fit for downtown Pequot Lakes. We discussed bringing <br /> those in for discussion in December. <br /> What we have been working on is a hybrid of a "form-based code". Our current zoning <br /> code is based on a standard model that is widely used nationwide. Our specific code is <br /> one that is based on the state shoreland regulations and is similar to ordinances found in <br /> most of the local communities(Nisswa, Breezy Point, Crosslake, Pine River, etc...) These <br /> codes are generally exclusive in that they list uses that are allowed, excluding all others, <br /> and set up standards detailing those items the community does not want. They are a <br /> variation of Euclidian zoning, establishing a zoning classification with a table of uses for <br /> all lands within the city. <br /> While these codes are the predominant method of zoning nationwide, they have a <br /> number of significant drawbacks, particularly in small towns. Mainly, they are very <br /> complex, yet fail to address many of the issues that a community may face. This leaves <br /> councils, commissions, property owners and applicants frustrated at how difficult a code <br /> is to interpret, how the code does not address key issues of concern, or both. The <br /> solutions to problems in the code are often reactionary, which tends to create even more <br /> regulation and ultimately doesn't solve the underlying problem that are revealed by the <br /> next unexpected event. <br /> Form-based coding is significantly different. It regulates the form and mass of <br /> structures, not the use. The Institute of Form Based Codes defines them as follows <br /> (www.formbasecodm com): <br /> A method of regulating development to achieve a specific urban form. Form- <br /> based codes create a predictable public realm primarily by controlling physical <br /> form, with a lesser focus on land use, through city or county regulations. <br /> Form-based codes address the relationship between building facades and the <br /> public realm, the form and mass of buildings in relation to one another, and the <br /> scale and types of streets and blocks. The regulations and standards in Form- <br /> based codes, presented in both diagrams and words, are keyed to a regulating <br /> plan that designates the appropriate form and scale (and therefore, character) of <br /> development rather than only distinctions in land-use types. This is in contrast to <br /> conventional zoning's focus on the micromanagement and segregation of land <br /> uses, and the control of development intensity through abstract and <br /> uncoordinated parameters (e.g., FAR, dwellings per acre, setbacks, parking <br /> ratios, traffic LOS) to the neglect of an integrated built form. Not to be confused <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report 6(a)-1 <br /> December 11,2oo8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.