My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8 - MInutes 041708
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
05-15-2008 Planning Commission Meeting
>
8 - MInutes 041708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2016 11:32:08 AM
Creation date
6/10/2016 11:32:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12. Both Tract A and Tract B meet the minimum frontage on public right-of-way '1 <br /> requirement of 33 feet, with the subdivision of Tract C being reserved for ingress <br /> and egress for both Tracts A and B and lands to the west of the subject property. .._. <br /> Tracts A and B would each own an undivided one-half interest in Tract C, <br /> subject to the following conditions: <br /> 1. The owners of Tracts A and B shall submit a common ownership and <br /> maintenance agreement of Tract C to the City. <br /> 2. The gravel driveway on Tract A shall be reduced in such a way so not as to - <br /> encroach upon the side yard setback. <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. -- <br /> b. Frederick Soukup- Subdivision Discussion <br /> Mr. Soukup stated that he would like to subdivide his 16 acre parcel into2 or 3 lots. He <br /> had met with Pat Trottier at Landecker and Associates who suggested he meet with the <br /> Planning Commission to discuss a potential subdivision. Creating more tha t:24ots would <br /> require platting. Mr. Trottier was concerned with buildable lot area. <br /> Mr. Marohn stated that he had seen the,sketch from Lanteer. Two lots would not be a <br /> problem, but 3 lots would be difficult. 1°here,may not be enough buildable area. Mr. -' <br /> Soukup would need a topographic survey. Two:lots do not rewire to be platted. He <br /> could subdivide into two lots, a 5 and an l l acre. In three years he could split the 11 acre -1 <br /> parcel, provided there is enou gh buildable area,- He will-ticed to get a topographic survey. <br /> OPEN FORUM: - <br /> Jim Byrne-4905 Olson'.][ C -Ili re�c.eived 2 permits from the City. The first was to <br /> remove and:rcpla e a new roof and frost footings and the second was to enclose deck. <br /> With a rainstorm lagt-summef:With the roof off, interior walls were damaged and he _ <br /> replaced the 3 walls without a per-m- it, <br /> Staff received,a report that anew house had been constructed. Permits are public <br /> knowledge. Mr:Byrne met with Staff last week. If he had come in and applied for a <br /> permit, he would have received an over the counter permit. Staff's recommendation <br /> would be to apply for a permit and pay the after the fact fee. The other option would be <br /> to explain to the Planning Commission what happened and see what type of <br /> recommendation they give. - <br /> The Planning Commission advised Mr. Byrne to apply for a permit and pay the fee for <br /> an over the counter permit for what was constructed, with no after the fact fee. - <br /> Scott and Julie Smith: - <br /> Minutes 16 _ <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April 17, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.