Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Woog temporarily closed the public hearing to move to another item on the <br /> Agenda. <br /> ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA: <br /> Add: <br /> 9. b. Frederick Soukup—Subdivision Discussion <br /> 9. c. Park Board Liaison <br /> NEW BUSINESS: <br /> a. Metes and Bounds Subdivision—David Bretz <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Mr. Bretz was in attendance and understood the <br /> condition regarding the driveway. <br /> A motion was made by Tom Adams, seconded by Mary Peterson,to approve the metes <br /> and bounds subdivision,based on the following Findings of Fact: <br /> 1. The property is properly zoned Commercial and is suitable in its natural state for <br /> commercial uses as permitted in the C zone. The property has been used for <br /> commercial purposes. <br /> 2. There are not any significant natural features, such as steep slopes or wetlands <br /> that would constrain future development on these properties. <br /> 3. The Gravel driveway on Tract A encroaches upon the side yard setback. The other <br /> structures located on this property are conforming as they meet all required <br /> setbacks and the total impervious falls under the 25%maximum allowed. <br /> 4. Each of the lots in the proposed subdivision has a separate on-site sewage <br /> treatment system. <br /> 5. Both Tract A and Tract B have an on-site well for a water supply source. <br /> 6. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation as these <br /> properties are not adjacent to any water bodies. <br /> 7. Both lots meet the minimum buildable lot size of 20,000 square feet in the C <br /> zone, with Tract A being 21,061 square feet and Tract B being 40,521 square feet. <br /> Tract C would be a non-conforming lot for the sole purpose of ingress, egress, and <br /> utility easement. <br /> 8. Tracts A and B meet the minimum lot width of 50 feet, with both Tract A and <br /> Tract B being just over 117 feet wide. <br /> 9. Tracts A and B meet the impervious coverage limit of 25% for the Commercial <br /> zone, with Tract A having approximately 23.8% coverage and Tract B currently <br /> having about 12.1% coverage. <br /> 10. The proposed lot layouts are compatible with the existing layout of adjoining <br /> properties and the proposed lot lines are parallel and perpendicular to existing lot <br /> lines. Future development will not be constrained by the proposed lot layouts. <br /> 11. The proposed side lot line is at right angles to the existing road line and the <br /> property line of the adjacent property. <br /> Minutes 15 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April 17, 2008 <br />