My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
07-15-2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2016 11:28:18 AM
Creation date
6/7/2016 11:28:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. what does it look like at the end; <br /> c. what is the connectivity; <br /> d. area parks accessible. <br /> We need to develop a new mind set. <br /> In the rural area development along the lakes creates a surplus of tax revenue. There are <br /> narrow lots with narrow roads. The roads have gotten wider and changed the character of <br /> the neighborhood and have become more expensive to maintain. The need to commute <br /> has increased access. <br /> We need to change the road standards in the rural area, shift lot sizes and put in place <br /> codes stating the infrastructure is going to be maintained by the property owners, not the <br /> City. This could be included in the strategies. <br /> Redevelopment occurs with code changes—no big signs, no parking lots, no drive thru's. <br /> It's a neighborhood. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority could kick start each <br /> block, one at a time. That will drive the development along that block, creating a higher <br /> tax base. The code changes should be specific instead of general, such as requiring curb, <br /> gutter, sidewalks and possibly tree lined streets. Inserting two pictures of the different <br /> types of development would be helpful. <br /> Infrastructure Section— <br /> Mr. Marohn will submit a draft of the new section next month. <br /> Chairman Woog opened the Public Hearings. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS: <br /> APPLICANT: Jeff Garland, L&J Investments <br /> Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit for a Dog Boarding/Daycare Business <br /> (Reconsideration) <br /> A motion was made by Scott Pederson, seconded by Tom Adams, to reconsider the <br /> Conditional Use Permit request for a Dog Boarding/Daycare Business. All members <br /> voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> Mr. Marohn explained that the Planning Commission is taking a second look at the facts <br /> and that the Staff Report has not changed and includes the same Findings of Fact and <br /> Conditions as last month. The Planning Commission will consider new information. <br /> Applicant was present, as well as his attorney, Lonny Thomas. <br /> Chairman Woog stated there have been letters received from George Selvestra, Realtor <br /> Ken Olson, Harly Simchuck and Deb Brown. All of these letters will be made part of the <br /> record. <br /> Minutes 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> July 17, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.