My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
03-18-2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2016 11:28:10 AM
Creation date
6/7/2016 11:28:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Action on the digital reader board was tabled until the April Planning Commission <br /> `.., meeting. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: Mr. Habein, Aye; Ms. Brown, Aye; Mr. Derksen,Nay; Mr. <br /> Williams,Aye; Mr. Hallan, Aye, Mr. Pederson, Aye. Motion Carried. Aye 5-Nay 1. <br /> A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded by Bill Habein, directing Staff to review <br /> the lighting plan information, confirm that it meets the intent of the approval from our <br /> last meeting and report back to the Planning Commission next month. All members <br /> voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> Staff was directed to look at digital signs. <br /> Mr. Williams stated that there seems to be excess temporary signage on the site now. Mr. <br /> Marohn stated Staff is looking into that. The Nor-Son site is also being looked at. Mr. <br /> Williams asked if that constitutes a violation on this site. Mr. Marohn stated that the <br /> excess signage is not listed as a violation; it is still under investigation. <br /> APPLICANT: David Kennedy <br /> Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit for a Home Occupation <br /> Mr. Kennedy submitted a written request to postpone this public hearing. A motion was <br /> made by Bill Habein, seconded by Mark Hallan,to table this public hearing. All <br /> members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> APPLICANT: Thomas Link <br /> Applicant requests a Variance for an Accessory Structure in Side-Yard Setback <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Applicant was present as well as his attorney, <br /> Thomas Fitzpatrick. <br /> Mr. Fitzpatrick explained that the Planning Commission had made a previous decision on <br /> this matter and should not look at this as a review. This is a new application and asked <br /> that the Planning Commission approach it that way. The applicants are requesting a 4.3 <br /> foot variance request. <br /> He further explained that the property involved is on Lower Cullen Lake and was platted <br /> approximately 90 years ago and does not resemble current standards. There is a <br /> challenging topographic hill to the rear. Neighbor Elaine May did not like the pontoon <br /> trailer being parked on her side of the garage. A very small portion of the garage is <br /> within the setback, 5.7 feet from the property line itself. An area of about 15 square feet <br /> is within the side yard setback. In 2008 the Planning Commission denied their request <br /> for an after-the-fact variance leaving them with the choice of moving the building which <br /> is very costly, a minimum of$8,000 and disruption of the Link property or removing the <br /> garage. <br /> Minutes 10 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> March 18, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.