My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7A - Downtown Plan
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
02-21-2008 Planning Commission Meeting
>
7A - Downtown Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2016 2:12:09 PM
Creation date
5/18/2016 2:12:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Street Name Estimated Cost <br /> County Road 112 $355000 <br /> Washington Avenue $845,000 <br /> Government Drive $660,000 <br /> Sibley Street(east of 371) $150,000 <br /> Oriole Street $260,000 <br /> Main Street(east of 371) $290,000 <br /> Butler Street(east of 371) $135,000 <br /> Woodman Street(from 371 to Gov't Drive) $15,000 <br /> Woodman Street(from Gov't Drive to#112) $200,000 <br /> Woodman(west of 371) $160,000 <br /> Second Avenue $180,000 <br /> First Avenue $65,000 <br /> Butler Street(west of 371) $30,000 <br /> Main Street(west of 371) $195,000 <br /> Front Street $340,000 <br /> Frontage Road west of 371 $25,000 <br /> Old State Highway 371 $440,000 <br /> New Municipal Parking Lot $140,000 <br /> There are some important notes that must be made in the street by street examination <br /> of cost. First,the cost estimate assumes the improvements are to be done in one large <br /> project. Splitting the project into multiple phases may help with financing,but it would <br /> increase the overall project costs due to the cost of running multiple projects. <br /> Additionally,when looking at an assessment strategy, it is important to understand the <br /> interrelationship of the improvements and the benefit to the entire area it creates. For <br /> example, while the new municipal parking lot will not directly serve any one specific <br /> business, it will provide an overall benefit to all downtown properties. Dealing with <br /> these enhancements in a piecemeal fashion will fail to appropriately capture and <br /> distribute the benefits of the project. <br /> Funding Sources <br /> J:o succeed over the long-term,the proiect must be_financially viable. As such,.a number __- o•bcaa:while there maybe some <br /> o fundin options have been examined with an understanding at some or all of them grant or low interest loan programs <br /> g, �+ available to assist a community in <br /> will be needed to make the project possible getting a downtown project started, <br /> k------------------------------------ <br /> the project will need to stand on its <br /> � own financially in order t <br /> • General Fund Revenue. The City currently budgets a significant amount o• finanfollyino dart <br /> of money annually for road and street improvements. Improvements to the Dekt•d: recommendation that all of <br /> downtown area are part of the future projection for roads and streets funding, them need to be parr of the finding <br /> While the project will require more funding than a simple street improvement mix for the project. <br /> would, the general fund revenue already dedicated to this purpose can be <br /> utilized to offset the total project cost. <br /> • Assessments. A direct assessment to benefited property owners is the <br /> critical component the recommended funding strategy. In order to assess a <br /> Pequot Lakes Downtown Plan-Updated February 2008 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.