My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9A - Minutes 111810
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
12-16-2010 Planning Commission Meeting
>
9A - Minutes 111810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2016 3:42:44 PM
Creation date
5/13/2016 3:42:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Marohn concurred that this is where we are at. He asked Mr. Miller to describe on <br /> the drainage plan what is going to happen to the east of units 25 —28. What is <br /> maintaining natural grade. <br /> Mr. Miller stated Units 25 &26 are down in the open area. Units 27 &28 are just <br /> starting to go up hill and they will need to grade a little. They will need a lot of fill in <br /> that area in order to get up that hill. Where the lodge is being removed will leave a large <br /> hole. Units 25 & 26 will walkout on lakeside, 27 & 28 walkout to lake also. Units 29 & <br /> 30 flattens out and no walkouts. Units 31 & 32 sit natural. <br /> Mr. Marohn stated the vegetation plan indicates there is vegetation right up to Units 27 & <br /> 28. Mr. Miller stated the plan may show too much vegetation;it should stop in the <br /> vicinity of Unit 30. There is going to be grading that takes place in:a portion of#30. Mr. <br /> Marohn pointed out that that is the area where the concern was. Not everyone is on board <br /> AM <br /> and they need to be careful as not everybody under thfids.that. When it was suggested to <br /> move the units back from the shore,Mr. Miller ssttaed they could not as there would be no <br /> parking stall outside of the garage. <br /> V <br /> Mr. Marohn suggested building Units 29 & 30 witho kouts. Mr. Miller stated that <br /> could be done; they don't need walkouts in that area 16 'll have the engineer change <br /> that. <br /> Mr. Miller asked if the Planning Commission wanted any of this presented to Tim Houle, <br /> City Engineer, for comment Greg Halling,the engineer,explained how the 100-year <br /> storm event was design ° �VlPCA will have final review of the sewer system. <br /> A <br /> Mr. Marohn state the-lities art private,the stormwater management plan is going to <br /> be reviewed by the PCA ftoni/ ee w4 <br /> ,y City Engineer needs to be involved. <br /> Final Plat requires him to sign�ff sk him to review it. If there is something, <br /> let's identify it and have Mr. Ii4e look at it. With no public improvements, Mr. <br /> Marohn does not see any reason orV1r Houle to review or comment. <br /> Regarding the dry hydrant,Mr. Miller stated he met with the Fire Chief who suggested <br /> either a hydrant on site that the Fire Department could tap into or a dry hydrant. Mr. <br /> Miller stated they can't get enough water for him to hook into. He will submit the dry <br /> hydrant plan directly to the Fire Chief for approval. <br /> Mr. Hallan asked what the triggers were for the phase-in of the septic system. Mr. Miller <br /> stated the phasing has been discussed with the PCA. The plan is very definitive by <br /> number of units; anything that is not in that first phase, 12 or 13, anything else is part of <br /> the next system. They are talking about creating holding capacity for the first few <br /> buildings are built until they reach a flow to run the treatment plant. If only one building <br /> is built,there is not enough flow. Holding and pumping for a specific period of time is an <br /> option until they reach that flow. The PCA will be very specific. <br /> Minutes 6 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> November 18, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.