My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9A - Minutes 081910
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
09-16-2010 Planning Commission Meeting
>
9A - Minutes 081910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2016 2:53:57 PM
Creation date
5/13/2016 2:53:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 5 (a), 6-b, Mrs. Beaver suggested the Planning Commission may want to add to <br /> clearing, "trimming and limbing",rather than just clearing. <br /> #13: Mrs. Beaver asked if the 22 unit number is still correct. Mr. Miller stated that <br /> number is outdated. <br /> #17: Mrs. Beaver questioned whether what was required was accomplished regarding the <br /> second beach not being allowed. Chairman Woog asked Mr. Marohn if restoration has <br /> been met. Mr. Marohn stated staff is satisfied that vegetation has been established and is <br /> growing. It is new vegetation and will take time to mature. <br /> Becky Hurst, 27557 Nature Drive: supports what Ann Beaver stated as it related to the <br /> City overseeing the trimming or what is done with the vegetation. <br /> Dick Rydell,has been part of the resort property for 26 years and years ago where that <br /> second beach was,there were 3 trailers parked. What is there now is a huge <br /> improvement. He doesn't understand why someone buying in there is held to a different <br /> standard than someone buying a freestanding cabin on the lake. Mr. Marol4 explained <br /> that there is a difference. This property is being developed as a PUD and they are <br /> allowed densities and number of structures and building beyond regular property owners. <br /> There are different restrictions to clearing and vegetation removal. <br /> Mr. Jaeger, 27567 Nature Drive: His concern is the 6 cabins in the back and asked if the <br /> plan is for a big lodge up there. Mr. Mille-r stated that yes,that is the plan. Mr. Jaeger <br /> `• stated he has no objection to the cabins 100 yards back from him, but he is concerned <br /> with the commotion from the lodge and pool noise. The peace and tranquility will not be <br /> there. Trees have been removed. He doesn't understand what trees will be taken down. <br /> His objection is to what is being put where the 6 cabins are. This is not Breezy Point. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED. <br /> Mr. Habein stated he doesn't think that the Planning Commission should be asked to <br /> micromanage cutting of every tree. We should set standards for size, etc and leave it at <br /> that. We can't go out each time they want to cut a tree. We need to set standards and <br /> conditions and abide by those. <br /> Mr. Pederson stated he heard positive input out at the site visit and one point is they are <br /> not intending on whipping out everything. They are choosing areas, from the decks <br /> looking out. He is in favor of assisting when one is done and then not having to go out <br /> after that. There is a lot of vegetation and he likes the window area, maybe 30 feet in <br /> front of the cabin. He is in favor of someone assisting on the first one, such as the DRT. <br /> Ms. Brown is concerned with the limbing and is a real believer of natural vegetation from <br /> the lake. Who decides what view is the best? Not everyone's view is the right view. She <br /> is not comfortable to give a free pass to limb at their discretion. Who would enforce this? <br /> Dead trees and limbs should come down. How do we come to a middle ground? <br /> Minutes 3 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> August 19, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.